It's a bit underexposed, could do with brightening in post.Waterfall from Iceland - 30 second exposure
It's a bit underexposed, could do with brightening in post.Waterfall from Iceland - 30 second exposure
Are those all your photos? Some good shots in there.
Good job.Yep.
I wouldn't put the differences down to the equipment. I like the close-ups on 20th Sept 15 and 31st Aug 12. The 2016 photos have been taken from above the lizards, and I think it looks better when you're lower.You can see the improvement chronologically as the camera equipment is improved.
Good job.
I wouldn't put the differences down to the equipment. I like the close-ups on 20th Sept 15 and 31st Aug 12. The 2016 photos have been taken from above the lizards, and I think it looks better when you're lower.
It's a bit underexposed, could do with brightening in post.
Definitely. The brightest part of the snow is close to clipping, as is the brightest part of the waterfall. Your white balance is a bit cool (blue), but that might be an artistic choice, it was cold after all. It that the full shot as you took it, or have you cropped it at all?
Any better?
Definitely. The brightest part of the snow is close to clipping, as is the brightest part of the waterfall. Your white balance is a bit cool (blue), but that might be an artistic choice, it was cold after all. It that the full shot as you took it, or have you cropped it at all?
Any better?
FFS is that Seljalandsfoss. If so, I had to photograph it a few years back in the middle of winter, it was honestly the coldest that I have ever been in my life, it was hours before the feeling came back to my hands. Beautiful nevertheless and the only waterfall in the world that you can walk behind
Bank Holiday Monday Storm Katie.
WOW
impressive, be careful out there though.
if that was me I would consider putting that on a canvas
excellent picture once again
I think you're right.....you stick that on a 6 foot x 2 foot canvas Jack and i'd bloody buy it. Might be worth photo-shopping out that monstrosity they call the i360 pole though. Spoils the whole picture IMHO
Thanks Zukey. Looks good. A 60" x 24" print would cost £ 152.99this is the website I use for mine
you can view it in different frames etc
http://www.canvas4life.co.uk/
I think it could do with some work in Lr before printing that large.I'll get another price from someone I know who does this sort of thing and go from there
I think it could do with some work in Lr before printing that large.
Happy to have a go to give you more ideas if you'd like
Can I download it from somewhere?Thanks Triggaaar. The original is much sharper being over 6.61 mb as opposed to the 156 kb shrunk version posted on here.
Here it is on Flickr, full size.