AND of course meanwhile the top 0.1% super-rich get ever more obscenely richer and richer. Including those tax dodging press barons who run the Mail and the Sun. The share of wealth owned by the top 0.1% is almost the same as the bottom 90%.I don't think austerity was a mistake, we can't keep spending more than we take in indefinitely. What was a mistake, well...it wasn't a mistake rather than an ideological point of principle was where the cuts were made. When someone like Ian Duncan-Smith says that benefits are being cut too far then you know you're in trouble. I think if anyone has even a basic understanding of the effect of, say,a £15 a week cut to someone trying to manage on £100 a week then it would never have happened. I don't think Osborne made the decision maliciously but he was supremely ignorant. Definitely say sorry for that and rectify it and ensure it never happens again.
Also an admission that "we're all in it together" was never true. For individuals and for income tax there's an argument that the burden was spread fairly. Over the last few years, the tax the UK collected from the highest earners has increased as a percentage of overall tax quite noticeably. Not so true for corporation tax and although corporation tax receipts have increased, I don't think anyone can argue that there were any austerity measures that were placed upon them nor pressure brought to bear on those companies whose tax avoidance went so far as to take the p*ss.