Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

General Election 2017



Buzzer

Languidly Clinical
Oct 1, 2006
26,121
That may be true but all the evidence also suggested that Hitler wanted no war with the UK and, indeed, sued for peace in 1940. Chamberlain may have been persuaded that Hitler wanted no war ... as that was the case.

I'd point to that opinion poll in my previous post. 93% of the UK public who were not privy to any better information were still sure Hitler still had other plans and 83% of the UK public thought that we owed it to other European countries to protect them from attack. Given that then if Chamberlain had actual proof, assuming the Foreign Office had passed on Maclean's information, then Chamberlain had a duty towards the British to challenge Hitler with it at Munich, warn him of the consequences and return with a different agreement.
 




Buzzer

Languidly Clinical
Oct 1, 2006
26,121
That documentary sounds interesting - do you know what it's called?

It's a two-parter. The first deals with Moscow and the latter with St Petersburg. It's the actor Brian Cox, by the way! And he focuses on the huge part the Scots played in Russian history, it really is incredible, and likewise how the Russian revolution influenced John Maclean, the revolutionary Scottish socialist.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episodes/b08n8v8m
 


ManOfSussex

We wunt be druv
Apr 11, 2016
15,168
Rape of Hastings, Sussex
I'd point to that opinion poll in my previous post. 93% of the UK public who were not privy to any better information were still sure Hitler still had other plans and 83% of the UK public thought that we owed it to other European countries to protect them from attack. Given that then if Chamberlain had actual proof, assuming the Foreign Office had passed on Maclean's information, then Chamberlain had a duty towards the British to challenge Hitler with it at Munich, warn him of the consequences and return with a different agreement.

70% of The British public backed the Iraq war.
 


ManOfSussex

We wunt be druv
Apr 11, 2016
15,168
Rape of Hastings, Sussex
We've got the benefit of hindsight to see why Chamberlain was wrong but at that time in 1938, the likes of Attlee and Churchill were not exactly in step with British popular opinion. The UK didn't want a war at that time and you only have to see the photos who mobbed Chamberlain on his return to see how popular the agreement was across the nation.

I know. The Daily Mail thought Munich was a great idea.

1938-daily-mail-front-page-reporting-the-signing-of-the-munich-peace-e5ggwb.jpg
 


Gwylan

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
31,827
Uffern
I'd point to that opinion poll in my previous post. 93% of the UK public who were not privy to any better information were still sure Hitler still had other plans and 83% of the UK public thought that we owed it to other European countries to protect them from attack.

I don't think anyone at the time didn't believe Hitler had other plans (93% looks pretty low to me) but I wonder how many people thought those plans included the UK - not many, I'd guess.

And, yes, 83% may have thought that we should do more to protect other countries from attack, but what did that mean? Was that doing what Chamberlain did at Munich and enter in talks or did it mean fighting? There were clearly some who thought war inevitable - Churchill the obvious one - but I'm not sure that was a view widely held.

But even if the country did want war, Chamberlain, who'd been Chancellor, was well aware that we couldn't afford it and that may well have coloured his judgment. It's easy to portray Chamberlain as an incompetent fool but I wonder what other politicians would have done in his place - we'd have been defeated quickly if we'd gone to war in 1938. Chamberlain may well have received warnings but wasn't in a position to do much about it,

We'll never know what went on behind closed doors of course, but I do think Chamberlain has had a bum deal from history.
 




Buzzer

Languidly Clinical
Oct 1, 2006
26,121
70% of The British public backed the Iraq war.

Ah, apologies. All I was trying to do was show in my last post was underlying British sentiment rather than specific opinions of the likelihood of war. Almost universally, the British didn't trust Hitler and also believed we had a duty to protect the small European countries. And although they didn't trust him there was no proof that he was going to march and so given that the Munich agreement seems fair.

If they had known of the information that people like Maclean was passing on then I don't believe, given those polls, that the UK public would have supported the Munich agreement.
 
Last edited:


Gwylan

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
31,827
Uffern
It's a two-parter. The first deals with Moscow and the latter with St Petersburg. It's the actor Brian Cox, by the way! And he focuses on the huge part the Scots played in Russian history, it really is incredible, and likewise how the Russian revolution influenced John Maclean, the revolutionary Scottish socialist.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episodes/b08n8v8m

Thanks, I'll give that a look.
 


Buzzer

Languidly Clinical
Oct 1, 2006
26,121
I don't think anyone at the time didn't believe Hitler had other plans (93% looks pretty low to me) but I wonder how many people thought those plans included the UK - not many, I'd guess..

I reckon a good part of the 7% in denial were British blackshirts who thought their Teutonic poster boy could do no wrong.

but I do think Chamberlain has had a bum deal from history.

I agree.
 




The Rivet

Well-known member
Aug 9, 2011
4,592
Part One of the docu watched. Very good. I have to say the courage of the Russians in ww2 is beyond question. I am not discussing the postwar accusations. Good watch.
 


Buzzer

Languidly Clinical
Oct 1, 2006
26,121
Part One of the docu watched. Very good. I have to say the courage of the Russians in ww2 is beyond question. I am not discussing the postwar accusations. Good watch.

The statistic that blows me away is that 80% of Russian men born in 1923 died during the war.
 


spring hall convert

Well-known member
Nov 3, 2009
9,608
Brighton
Latest Tory Corruption - HSBC uses failing company chaired by Tory Party Treasurer & Chief Fundraiser, Michael Spencer as a vehicle to make £5m of donations to the Tory Party prior to 2010 election.

http://www.dorseteye.com/north/arti...s-the-hsbc-dirty-money-running-the-tory-party

I'm sure it was in no way related to George Osborne doing HSBC's bidding in the States when they were caught red handed laundering the Mexican drug money.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/business...d-for-leniency-in-americas-hsbc-money-launde/

Further detail here in a question asked at HSBC's recent AGM. As part of banking regulation in this country HSBC has an obligation to be politically neutral.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RD33GCxKtLA
 












kennyb

Active member
May 23, 2004
132
Lib Dem for me too like others cant vote for Corbyn plus voted remain so would be most apt vote for me though i think Peter Kyle is a great MP
 




deletebeepbeepbeep

Well-known member
May 12, 2009
21,794
The IFS reports that those on the lowest percentile income will lose 10% of income based on the tories implemented and planned tax and welfare plans.

QUB3oau.jpg
 


spring hall convert

Well-known member
Nov 3, 2009
9,608
Brighton
Lib Dem for me too like others cant vote for Corbyn plus voted remain so would be most apt vote for me though i think Peter Kyle is a great MP

It is your right to vote for whomever you choose.

However, the Lib Dems have no chance in Hove and I wouldn't worry too much about helping Corbyn become the next PM because it isn't going to happen.

Voting Lib Dem in Hove is only going to help the Tories. If you've got a local MP that you like, you should vote for him. It's not even like Kyle has towed the Corbyn line.....
 








Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here