- Thread starter
- #4,821
Did you knock this up yourself?
No they don't.2, your first comment contradicts your third
Looser lending arrangements apply across the country, not just in the south, and the lack of housing stock is not a policy, it's a result of the fact we're a small island with a lot of people living here and the south being popular, and strict rules about not building on green sites etc. To claim that disproportionately high rises in property prices in the south are down to government policy is mad.3, policies are numerous especially over a three or four decade period, but they broadly involve increasing demand (looser lending arrangements) and decreasing supply (decade-upon-decade of building insufficient stock)
It's not exactly difficult to tax income, since we do it already. The problem with taxing property is that it doesn't tax the wealthiest, it taxes those in the south.4, property tends to be the biggest asset, and is easy to tax because it's immobile. I would like to see far higher taxes on financial activity alongside greater regulation to reduce the role of that sector. This is much more difficult to achieve, because finance is highly mobile.
Who's that bloke who said he's gonna sort out all de foreigners? Is it that Boris bloke? He cracks me up! Wot happened to that Nick Griffin? I used to like him.
This parody account of old-skool online trolling is coming along nicely. But then I do like a bit of retro.
Are the DUP those people who were prancing around the last general election offering support for any party that would commit hugely disproportionate investment to their own constituencies? I distinctly remember Andrew Neil cutting them off in an interview because they were basically holding the government to ransom for about 3 seats.
They could end up with 8 or 9 seats , the price to pay is roughly an extra £1Bn in "investment funding" diverted to Northern Ireland as a thank you from the Tories.
Shirley hilarious satire! not trolling. Trolling is making a crass insensitive comment about a disaster, such as Brighton losing.This parody account of old-skool online trolling is coming along nicely. But then I do like a bit of retro.
They could end up with 8 or 9 seats , the price to pay is roughly an extra £1Bn in "investment funding" diverted to Northern Ireland as a thank you from the Tories.
Funnily enough, I was just thinking what a proper shìt parody account it is. Neither funny nor believable, sadly.
That's because you are a tw.t
Oh my sides.
Did you knock this up yourself?
...Conservatives and Farage.
I love the YouGov one in the Sun that they won't mention as it shows Labour in a lead and has done for several days, perhaps @Titanic writes for the Sun ?
UKIP are only likely to get 1-3 seats - they are an irrelevance, SNP could have 50+ and a really significant say in any coalitions/s&c deals etc...
They could end up with 8 or 9 seats , the price to pay is roughly an extra £1Bn in "investment funding" diverted to Northern Ireland as a thank you from the Tories.
They will be propping up the Tories , the DUP will take their 30 pieces of silver but UKIP will end up with their holy grail , an earlier than planned referendum on BREXIT