Everton would be good for him. And us if we could keep it to a loan. Premier League football, not a direct competitor, likely to get lots of game time under a vastly experienced manager who’ll play in a way that suits him. He’d learn a lot I think.
Everton? He’d come back looking and playing like Phil Stant or Duncan FergusonEverton would be good for him. And us if we could keep it to a loan. Premier League football, not a direct competitor, likely to get lots of game time under a vastly experienced manager who’ll play in a way that suits him. He’d learn a lot I think.
He needs to bloody show it thenIt reads to me that Ferguson wants to play.
Here I go reading between the lines again. FH praises Evan and would like to keep him but I get the impression that he’s not putting in the required effort in training and that he wants away in the article in today’s Argus.
Don’t jump on me, it’s just my thoughts, nothing else
I think him going to a very experienced manager at a club in a fight with a demanding fan base would be a very useful test of Evans potential. Also of whether is FH who's struggling to motivate some of these young players getting shipped out.Everton? He’d come back looking and playing like Phil Stant or Duncan Ferguson
*However, if Chelsea are prepared to pay the £20m 'Chelsea tax' on top of his suggested transfer fee, I suggest we should consider it.
The more bidding, the better.
Likely pushed from the club then. BBC don't just throw rumours out from bad sources and Simon Stone doesn't really miss.That article is odd. No quotes, no sources, but Simon Stone knows what we want to do...
If that's true, then I'd imagine it is an attempt to quash the £40m fee that has been stated twice by the Guardian. Expect a bidding war.
Pushed by the club or is it just one of those vague 'Brighton would sell IF his value is met (which could be said about any player)' type articles. I'd bet the latter.Likely pushed from the club then. BBC don't just throw rumours out from bad sources and Simon Stone doesn't really miss.
If that's true, then I'd imagine it is an attempt to quash the £40m fee that has been stated twice by the Guardian. Expect a bidding war.
Would we though? How can we miss Ferguson when he's hardly played?From the board's perspective, a bidding war with several desperate clubs involved, for a position that they all need urgent reinforcement in, with three and a half days to go is ideal.
From the team / fans perspective, it looks like we'll leave the January window weaker than we entered it.
Not from Simon Stone though. I know that around this time there is a lot of give and take with journalists and the club and expect something similar to have happened here.Pushed by the club or is it just one of those vague 'Brighton would sell IF his value is met (which could be said about any player)' type articles. I'd bet the latter.