That was in response to post#57.... If the EU is demanding AstraZeneca publish their contract I would assume they ( The EU ) feel they are in the right, morally and contractually.
Stop digging Vege
That was in response to post#57.... If the EU is demanding AstraZeneca publish their contract I would assume they ( The EU ) feel they are in the right, morally and contractually.
To be fair if the UK Government could see red tape coming the supermarkets would be fully stocked in Northern Ireland.
It's fine to criticise the EU for "bureaucracy" with its 32,000 civil servants, but UK alone employs almost half a million.
Department for Work and Pensions employs 80,790 alone.
Out of interest how many civil servants do the other EU countries employ? ie per country?
I don't know - what is the French for 'we're not going to blink first'?
Nous ne serons pas les premiers a clignoter Les yeux...... or something like that.
And I doubt if they ever said it because they dealt with the negotiations like grown-ups.
I'm pretty sure had we still been in the EU after a successful Remain campaign all the noise from the pro-EU bods on here and in the press would have been clamouring for the UK government to be good neighbourly Europeans and act in harmony wth nearly all of our EU partners though ...
Excuse me butting in, but Robert Peston, hardly a friend of BJ or the government laid the facts out yesterday - and very clearly;
Thread by @Peston on Thread Reader App – Thread Reader App
1,298 views
Robert Peston Profile picture
Robert Peston
Twitter logo
26 Jan, 9 tweets, 2 min read
The important difference between AstraZeneca's relationship with the UK and with the EU, and the reason it has fallen behind schedule on 50m vaccine doses promised to the EU, is that the UK agreed the deal with AZ a full three months before the EU did - which gave...
AZ an extra three months to sort out manufacturing and supply problems relating to the UK contract (there were plenty of problems). Here is the important timeline. In May AZ reached agreement with Oxford and the UK government to make and supply the vaccine. In fact Oxford...
had already started work on the supply chain. The following month AZ reached a preliminary agreement with Germany, the Netherlands, France and Italy, a group known as the Inclusive Vaccine Alliance, based on the agreement with the UK. The announcement was 13 June. BUT the EU...
insisted that the Inclusive Vaccine Alliance could not formalise the deal. The European Commission insisted it should take over the contract negotiations on behalf of the whole EU. So were another two months of talks and the contract was not signed till the end of August...
What is frustrating for AZ is that the extra talks with the European Commission led to no material changes to the contract, but wasted time on making arrangements to make the vaccine with partner sites. The yield at these partner sites has been lower than expected. The problem...
is in the course of being sorted. AZ say it is working 24/7 to make up the time and deliver the quantities the EU wanted. It says its contract with the EU - as with the UK - was always on a "best effort" basis, because it was starting from scratch to deliver unprecedented...
amounts for no profit. AZ is not blaming the EU. But it does not understand why it is being painted as the "bad guy" given that if the deal had happened in June, when Germany, the Netherlands, France and Italy wanted it done, most of these supply issues would already...
have been sorted. A pro-EU source at the company says "I understand Brexit better now".
PS According to AZ, the EU claim that it pays less to AZ per dose, and that is why AZ "works harder for the UK than for the EU", is "completely incorrect". It charges the same price to all buyers, wherever they are in the world, subject to small adjustments due to local costs
Now living in Spain I certainly take no pleasure form this, but facts are facts something the EU has to face one day. Vaccine for us two? Well as 75 approaches the best we can hope for will be later, very much so, this year.
Already vaccines have been spirited out for the 'needy' politicians, mayors, important ranks in the army etc. and there has been some resignation caused by this but there is only one reason for this unsightly attitude - lack of vaccines that is blamed squarely on Brussels.
So well done UK, the government and the inspired choice of the lady appointed to oversee vaccine procurement, it's what any country should be doing for its citizens.
Finally, if you are still reading, will the BBC and The Guardian own up to their July (around the 10th I think) headlines that the UK government are letting everyone down by not joining in with an EU vaccine order? They both slaughtered BJ for the decision - but hey ho - he got it spot on.
Shocking what's going on in Spain, I read that yesterday. Countries like Spain should have been organising it themselves.
It's an opinion but I don't think we would have allowed this to happen as members.
Who knows.
We need to help out wherever we can.
They certainly are maintaining that mature approach now.
I usually work on the basis that “there’s probably more to it than that” when people on either side are taking what could be a simplistic view on things. In secondary school education today they might call it critical thinking.
Excuse me butting in, but Robert Peston, hardly a friend of BJ or the government laid the facts out yesterday - and very clearly;
Thread by @Peston on Thread Reader App – Thread Reader App
1,298 views
Robert Peston Profile picture
Robert Peston
Twitter logo
26 Jan, 9 tweets, 2 min read
The important difference between AstraZeneca's relationship with the UK and with the EU, and the reason it has fallen behind schedule on 50m vaccine doses promised to the EU, is that the UK agreed the deal with AZ a full three months before the EU did - which gave...
AZ an extra three months to sort out manufacturing and supply problems relating to the UK contract (there were plenty of problems). Here is the important timeline. In May AZ reached agreement with Oxford and the UK government to make and supply the vaccine. In fact Oxford...
had already started work on the supply chain. The following month AZ reached a preliminary agreement with Germany, the Netherlands, France and Italy, a group known as the Inclusive Vaccine Alliance, based on the agreement with the UK. The announcement was 13 June. BUT the EU...
insisted that the Inclusive Vaccine Alliance could not formalise the deal. The European Commission insisted it should take over the contract negotiations on behalf of the whole EU. So were another two months of talks and the contract was not signed till the end of August...
What is frustrating for AZ is that the extra talks with the European Commission led to no material changes to the contract, but wasted time on making arrangements to make the vaccine with partner sites. The yield at these partner sites has been lower than expected. The problem...
is in the course of being sorted. AZ say it is working 24/7 to make up the time and deliver the quantities the EU wanted. It says its contract with the EU - as with the UK - was always on a "best effort" basis, because it was starting from scratch to deliver unprecedented...
amounts for no profit. AZ is not blaming the EU. But it does not understand why it is being painted as the "bad guy" given that if the deal had happened in June, when Germany, the Netherlands, France and Italy wanted it done, most of these supply issues would already...
have been sorted. A pro-EU source at the company says "I understand Brexit better now".
PS According to AZ, the EU claim that it pays less to AZ per dose, and that is why AZ "works harder for the UK than for the EU", is "completely incorrect". It charges the same price to all buyers, wherever they are in the world, subject to small adjustments due to local costs
Now living in Spain I certainly take no pleasure form this, but facts are facts something the EU has to face one day. Vaccine for us two? Well as 75 approaches the best we can hope for will be later, very much so, this year.
Already vaccines have been spirited out for the 'needy' politicians, mayors, important ranks in the army etc. and there has been some resignation caused by this but there is only one reason for this unsightly attitude - lack of vaccines that is blamed squarely on Brussels.
So well done UK, the government and the inspired choice of the lady appointed to oversee vaccine procurement, it's what any country should be doing for its citizens.
Finally, if you are still reading, will the BBC and The Guardian own up to their July (around the 10th I think) headlines that the UK government are letting everyone down by not joining in with an EU vaccine order? They both slaughtered BJ for the decision - but hey ho - he got it spot on.
Excellent.
The more simple and less gifted might suggest that if it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck and swims like a duck then it might well be a duck.
Excellent.
The more simple and less gifted might suggest that if it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck and swims like a duck then it might well be a duck.
I see the EU is demanding that AstraZeneca publish the contract they signed with each other.
It's an opinion but I don't think we would have allowed this to happen as members.
I think the UK would have gone down the German route with central procurement and a large sneaky order on the side.
It's lip service really. A kind of collaborative approach with the usual element of distrust. Somewhat expected and grudgingly understood.