For your point to be even close to valid, you need to be able to easily name, say, 5-6 comfortably bigger/more important performances for England since 96, given you think this one has been massively overstated.
To suggest if we go out on Saturday this win means nothing shows you have completely misunderstood the broader picture. There is a sizeable part of me that genuinely doesn’t give a shit if we get any further in this tournament or not. This was comfortably the most important win in my lifetime, hands down.
Anyway, sorry, your list of mythical wins. This should be good.
Well, firstly, I'm not arguing the game isn't important. Just that the BBC reaction to it was over the top.
Secondly, "5-6 comfortably bigger/more important" right, so if I point to 5 or 6 slightly more important than what you and Dan Roan have decided is the most important game in 55 years, my point doesn't get close to valid even though thouse examples would have bumped it down to 7th in the list of most important games, albeit by tiny margins?
Thirdly, why is the number of matches that I consider more important than a last 16 match of the Euros relevant to whether the BBC were over the top. Even if I could name 6 that you agreed were comfortable more important, it has little to do with whether the bbc were over the top and I wouldn't consider it proof that I was right they were over the top.
But really, why bother? You've already gone from 'the most importat match in the last 55 years', to the last 25 years. If I name 6 matches more important will we go down to the last 5 years, to the most important win this week?
But I won't name them, will I, there aren't 6 that are comfortably more important, again, that's not my argument. There are three that I would say were more important, maybe only marginally so...
v Italy 0-0 must not lose game in Italy to guarantee a place in 1998 world cup - having missed out on 94 a second world cup failure would have been pretty bad for English football and the national reputation
v Germany 5-1 in Germany revitalised our 2002 qualifying campaign that had faltered under Keegan
v Sweden in 2018 world cup to get to the semi finals
I'd say there were three equally as important (for which I don't recall such over the top jubilation from our broadcasters)...
v Denmark in the 2002 world cup to get to the quarter finals
v Ecuador in the 2006 world cup to get to the quarter finals
v Colombia in the 2018 world cup to get to the quarter finals
But, I don't care about the 'importance' argument. I think a win can be important, even very important, without needing to be celebrated the way the BBC did. I think our (Brighton's) win against Newport county was an important one - we'd been on a poor run of form in the league (8 matches without a win), mood was low, we'd just had a fight back draw with Wolves and looked like we had shot ourselves in the foot against a team we would have expected to beat given the league difference. That win gave us something, that built on the success of the draw v wolves (an equally important performance) that set us up for the run of games v city, leeds, liverpool, tottenham. But I don't remember us celebrating like we'd just won the cup. Like I said initially, the BBC's post-match coverage put me in mind of Hasenhuttl reaction to Southampton beating Liverpool. A good result, a great shrugging off of a bad historical result on a personal level, even on a national level, but a bit ott. The competition isn't over, there are still more matches to play to give that result meaning.