SIMMO SAYS
Well-known member
Two thumbs down from Husty----how will I get through the rest of the day
It's like talking to a brick wall. Just so I'm clear on this, you think it's only religious attire if you are required to wear it?
Two thumbs down from Husty----how will I get through the rest of the day
I don't disagree, there is big mistrust and some people are sick to death of their wants and trouble making etc, but I'll ask again, apart from just words, has their been killings in the West due to this "Islamophobia in the West".......or do the "words" compete with the ACTUAL slaughter or Christianophobia ACTUALLY going on in the East.
Why is that even relevant? If Muslims were dying in this country due to hate crime would you suddenly give the concept of islamaphobia credibility or are you just deflecting? But I suppose you've already given it credibility by saying people are sick to death of "their trouble making" and that's why those girls would gladly give you the middle finger.
What part of it is not part of their religious attire do you not understand. Ok then a crash helmet or balaclava has now been deemed part of my Christian attire, i shall be wearing it when i go to court, when i'm on transport or in public buildings, when i am getting cash out at the bank............
Credibility, credibility.......when and IF "Muslims ARE dying in this country", i will give it the "credibility" it deserves, until then you are doing a grand job of talking up something that is not happening. I think it is "credible" and fairly accurate that some people are getting sick to death of the wants/moans and the expected cowl tailing to what is a minority in this country......while the other religions and races here seem to rub along nicely and are fairly happy with their lot.
Fantastic job with the bike helmet analogy. Further proving my working theory that you're a bit of an idiot. But as you clearly are struggling with the whole burka concept let's break it down.
The Quran does not say that women have to wear a burka. The Quran does however talk about modesty and its relation with the "created and the creator". Some woman therefore choose to wear garments like the burka which was created so be worn in order to hide their modesty. It is a part of religious and cultural attire but it is not a requirement with the exemption of Afghanistan where it is required to be worn by law.
I know, and just because i do not agree i am an idiot eh.
Well again you have stated "It is a part of religious and cultural attire", when you have pointed out it is not part of their "religious attire", it is not a "requirement" IS it.
So they can hide their modesty on the streets, at home and other places.......but in schools? where anybody could do a burka male perhaps, in a bank where the teller needs to see the face (fraud etc) , how about a passport office eh, do you not think the face on show is a requirement.........everybody else has to adhere to having their face on show in certain places.......as this is NOT even a "religious" requirement, and this is NOT Afghanistan but Holland, best just uncover or avoid these buildings eh.
Why is that even relevant? If Muslims were dying in this country due to hate crime would you suddenly give the concept of islamaphobia credibility or are you just deflecting? But I suppose you've already given it credibility by saying people are sick to death of "their trouble making" and that's why those girls would gladly give you the middle finger.
You're an idiot, not because you disagree with me, but because you're comparing a burka to a cycling helmet. It's the kind of analogy you expect from someone who has no grasp on a situation. If you'd have compared it to a coif or kippah you'd have some credence but a bike helmet? You just look like a fool. As for this ongoing disagreement of ours I'll ask you this; would you say a kippah (skull cap) is a piece of religious attire?
women don't have a say in the muslim world,but you know that,right?
Well that's just not true but thanks for playing.
The Kippah whether it is or isn't is no matter, it does not cover the face so would not have to be removed, same as the Sikhs and the turban, which incidentally is part of their religious attire. The burka is not part of the religious attire, it is worn for modesty, unfortunately it covers the face and like other head wear can not be worn in certain places.
Perhaps your point or disagreement would have more "credibility" if you refrained from insulting, because calling me a "numpty" and "idiot" on a difference of opinion is poor. I can take or leave your opinions without having to put you down. I think the fact that you have stated that it is "It is a part of religious and cultural attire" after stating that it is not a "religious requirement" and is in fact worn for modesty, shows you are a tad wayward. Perhaps look at Afghanistan women in the 70's re "requirement and attire" and obviously even then NOT religious, the women were in skirts and tops......modesty really, must be a 21st century "requirement" eh.
so why can't women drive in saudi arabia?
I don't know but I'm pretty sure the country with biggest Muslim population on the planets was recently run by a female...
not really answering the question though,is it?
Well as I don't know the answer I can't tell you. Goes against your theory though.