What do I think the disaster plan should look like? Why do you think I should have any view on that whatsoever? No nobody has proven anything to anyone by posting links of newspaper articles and the like. I watched it and DC clearly alleged that when the disaster plan was asked for, there wasn't a working one and they had to start from scratch. Watch it yourself. Don't read articles, or listen to commentary (opinions of others) go to the primary source (which I did as I watched it live) and make your own mind up. Either way, can we agree that if there was not a working disaster plan then planks at the civil service need walking? Or do I need to have drafted one before you think I can form that opinion? What an utterly daft debate.
If you 'don't click on links', then it would be pointless me posting a link to the video of Cummings actually giving the evidence that you allege you heard in the background whilst working, but didn't - because he didn't actually say what you say he said - but you won't be able to hear what he did actually say, because you won't click on any links.
I think we should just leave it there, don't you?