pork pie
New member
Corruption has always been rife in China.
But then, corruption is rife in the UK too.
To compare the two really proves how stupid you are! lol
Corruption has always been rife in China.
But then, corruption is rife in the UK too.
Sydney...yeah, like we have been saying...it will take generations....Natal was a battleground for Inkatha and ANC... so hardly surprising.
Porkpie.. even the Afrikaaners have representation in parliament...a lot more than black people ever recieved during the apartheid govts.
Yer right! Quality maybe, but balanced? Who are you trying to kid? They are as bad as the BBC.
Clearly he is a great statesman, as I posted earlier. It could have so easily become another Rhodesia with the different tribes figting each other, and both brutalising white farmers and their workers, and stealing their land and possessions that they have worked so hard for generations to carve out of a wilderness.
In terms of what he has achieved, can you remind me what the "Rainbow Nation's" reaction was to a miners strike recently?
To compare the two really proves how stupid you are! lol
As has been said, the ANC will not allow any real opposition to exist.
This is quite an interesting thread, probably because Pork Pie is on my ignore list
1. What has Marikana got to do with Nelson Mandela averting a civil war 20 years ago?
2. No-one knows exactly what happened at Marikana (and I doubt that we ever will), but 44 people died there - 10 security guards, mine employees and police in the week before the massacre, 34 at the massacre. It was a systematic failure on all fronts - the government and trade unions for allowing strikes to turn violent (which is the norm now here sadly), and the police for their response to severe provocation.
3. I notice you do not mention the black farmers in Zim that were also brutalised, their land and possessions stolen. The situation in Zim was and still is all about political power, not some sort of anti-white crusade.
4. The ANC has failed the majority of people it is supposed to represent - it's record on education, healthcare, corruption, employment etc etc is appalling. However, that does not mean that "they" cannot govern - it means that those in power are incompetent. But then, the UK's record of government is not great either is it, so perhaps we whities cannot govern either?
5. What we do have in South Africa is a strong constitution and a growing opposition to the government. We have over 100,000 non-governmental, usually non-profit organisations that are doing fabulous work in all areas of society that you do not hear about - people who do not sit around all day waiting for government to do something for them, but those who get up and do things for themselves. We have the freedom that allows people like Moletsi Mbeki and Dr Mamphela Ramphele to be scathingly critical of this government without being locked up. Will SA become another Zim? Not whilst there are people like these about.
The BBC has been left-wing for years. Plagued by too many arty-farty pinkos with tweed jackets, beards and elbow patches.
Shame, you missed the part where he was talking about the MBA he was studying for.
Wow.
To be called stupid by someone as ignorant as you is quite a badge of honour. It means I'm doing or saying something right.
I will wear it with pride.
"Studied for" El Porno, a long time ago now. The point was simply made to demonstrate that the person was educated, but still believed that giving and taking bribes was a legitimate means of doing business. How do you tell students to account for them when you are teaching?
Stick them in entertaining expenses of course.
You do that. Maybe you could wear it when you are receiving your next mega bribe in some corrupt english business deal. You do know the EU/UK laws on anything even resembling bribes, and the penalties? Sorry, a smart guy like you obviously knows all about Corporate Governance in the UK.
Oh no, not the old the-BBC-is-a-hotbed-of-lefties myth.
The current chairman of the BBC Trust is Lord Patten, who served Prime Minister Thatcher and our nation so loyally, here and abroad. The Political Editor used to be chairman of the Young Conservatives. The long-serving Chief Political Correspondent recently left to take up a job as Boris Johnson's PR man. The current Editor of live programmes was in a right-wing organisation that was so extreme that even Norman Tebbit was obliged to close it down for being too right-wing loopy. That was the Federation of Conservative Students. Remember them? Maggie's Militant Tendency, they called themselves. Hardly a gang of swivel-eyed Marxist nutters plaguing our airwaves. And you don't get Labour supporters citing these facts as evidence of supposed right-wing bias at the BBC.
I have no idea how many influential people who work at the BBC you have met, and I'd be happy to be shot down in flames if your experiences are radically different to mine. By influential, I mean decision-makers like commissioning editors, anchors, producers, reporters, editors, presenters and the like. My job has obliged me to come into contact with the BBC from time to time so I've met quite a few of these people over the last few decades and, if I was asked to take an educated guess at their political leanings, I would say that they all gave the appearance of being natural Tory voters. All of the ones I have met, without exception, come from relatively well-off backgrounds and every single one was educated privately. I've only met a few dozen such people in this huge organisation, but natural-born lefties appear to me to be thin on the ground at the Beeb in my experience.
I am not suggesting that private education therefore equals right-winger. But the likelihood that they are all raving Trotskyites is, at the very least, open to question.
These arty-farty pinkos with tweed jackets, beards and elbow-patches you talk about....where are they then? I would be amazed, absolutely staggered even, if you were to spend a month wandering the corridors of the BBC and you found even one person who resembled this ridiculous stereotype. Of course, you are entitled to your views about the BBC, but is it really fair to state stuff like this with no evidence at all?
Just because a news organisation does not express traditional right-wing views does not automatically mean it is left-wing, or vice-versa. Just because a news organisation poses what some, on the right and the left, might consider to be uncomfortable questions, doesn't make it necessarily against that particular view; it means it's being neutral and asking for opinions to be clarified on behalf of their viewers and / or listeners. This is exactly what it is supposed to be doing. Indeed, it is obliged by law to do exactly this; to uphold impartiality. Just the same as ITN and Sky News.
The idea that an organisation this vast could possibly lean one way more than the other is difficult to sustain; it's just too bloody big and spread out. If it were possible, however, the balance of probability is that it would bend to the right, if anything. And I don't for one moment think that it does.
Unbelievable.
The sad fact is, you probably really believe that.
I expect at least 15 pages and Bushy and Tubthumper to have had a spot of online fisticuffs by the time I next check this thread. I hope so, anyway.
Very well put, Aseros.
Nonetheless, it will leave the lefties and uneducated upset.
Thank you for such a detailed reply. You confirmed the facts about the ANC which others on here simply cannot grasp. It is rather unfair to compare the UK Government with the state of South African society, or even any African country. We are a functioning state, and whilst we believe that we have much to moan about, it is marginal compared to the poor people of Africa's lot.