Solid at the back
Well-known member
I'm surprised about this. He really improved after a very touhjt start to his career here. He's worked hard, and looks good.
Meant 4-3-3!We play 4-4-3 including an attacking midfielder like Llalanna or a forward in a support role. Plenty of You Tube videos available to see how we play. We definitely don’t play with 2 players as strikers ( focal point up front)
We don't play this way at all. If you want to get all technical talking about YouTube videos I can get a lot more technical.We play 4-4-3 including an attacking midfielder like Llalanna or a forward in a support role. Plenty of You Tube videos available to see how we play. We definitely don’t play with 2 players as strikers ( focal point up front)
SAUCES say his motivation is a craving for a German doner kebabJust maybe he’s one of those players who puts playing in front of the money.
None of them will ever be worrying about paying their leccy bills.
So one of your strikers doesn’t play as a full striker then.We don't play this way at all. If you want to get all technical talking about YouTube videos I can get a lot more technical.
When we have the ball in our defensive third we operate in a 2-4-2-2 with our CBs dropping deep, our fullbacks and midfielders sitting slightly in front of them and then our strikers/attacking midfielder dropping in slightly deeper to lure the opposition CBs out of position. This means in essence our attacking midfielder and striker are doing the same role.
Hence why I called them both a hybrid of strikers and attacking midfielders. Our central attacking players are supposed to be able to receive the ball, hold it up and lay it off. Even when someone like Ferguson is playing he drops deep a lot. Lallana/Mac were essentially playing next to him as a double false 9 system.
So yes, we play with two strikers, but they just don't play as full strikers. Ferguson + Welbeck + Undav produced some of our best moments last season as a duel striking partnership for example
Not true, there's one on North StreetSAUCES say his motivation is a craving for a German doner kebab
Neither of our strikers play as a full striker.So one of your strikers doesn’t play as a full striker then.
This part for example.Hence why I called them both a hybrid of strikers and attacking midfielders. Our central attacking players are supposed to be able to receive the ball, hold it up and lay it off. Even when someone like Ferguson is playing he drops deep a lot. Lallana/Mac were essentially playing next to him as a double false 9 system.
Meant 4-3-3!
I would accept 4-2-3-1. As I said In my post we play with an attacking midfielder or a forward in a support role. Not sure why you are getting so upset because basically we are in agreement. GK, LB, RB, CB x 2, DM x2, AM/FWD, RW, LW, STKNeither of our strikers play as a full striker.
Maybe actually read what I've posted before replying to it?
This part for example.
A 4-3-3 is nothing like what we play. A 4-3-3 indicates a more defence minded CM in between two box to box/more attacking midfielders. Two wingers or inside forwards and a focal point.
That is nothing at all how we play. We essentially play with a double Segundo Volante pivot in the midfield.
One of these is more defensive (Caicedo) and the other more attacking (Mac Allister, Groß) and had the added responsibility of creating and arriving into the area for shots.
Centrally ahead of these two we have two players that don't play as a focal point. They operate by dropping deep. If you want to define them as terms then they would likely be false 9 and second striker roles. Neither of them operating as a traditional number 9, but more in the mold of players like Kane and Havertz pre Chelsea.
The best ways to describe our line up really is a 4-2-4, or a 4-2-3-1 depending on how traditional you want to be with your positions.
Because we don't play with a striker at all in a traditional sense but also don't play with a traditional central attacking midfielder.I would accept 4-2-3-1. As I said In my post we play with an attacking midfielder or a forward in a support role. Not sure why you are getting so upset because basically we are in agreement. GK, LB, RB, CB x 2, DM x2, AM/FWD, RW, LW, STK
Like Llalanna and Mac Alistair?Because we don't play with a striker at all in a traditional sense but also don't play with a traditional central attacking midfielder.
We play with two 9.5s who alternate, not a traditional striker at all