Spot on.crasher said:Couldn't agree more. Holt's brief is to write "controversial" columns but this is just bollocks from top to bottom.
Who says Hunt deliberately kneed Cech? You can' tell from watching the replay 100 times.
Coppell put out a team that got a draw at Old Trafford. (more than almost anyone else manages). What's the problem.
The fact that Holt can't name a famous Reading player is a typical myopic Premiership-obsessed hack attitude. They've been a lower-league club most of their days - doesn't mean they haven't had their own legends.
And Reading fans had every reason and right to give Pardew and McGee abuse - both professed loyalty and then f***ed off.
Holt's underlying motive seems to be a kind of snobbery against small clubs crashing the Premiership party. If it wasn't for teams like Reading punching above the weight the Premier League would be even duller than it already is.
We all know Madjeski's an arse. But so is Oliver Holt.
crasher said:Couldn't agree more. Holt's brief is to write "controversial" columns but this is just bollocks from top to bottom.
Who says Hunt deliberately kneed Cech? You can' tell from watching the replay 100 times.
Coppell put out a team that got a draw at Old Trafford. (more than almost anyone else manages). What's the problem.
The fact that Holt can't name a famous Reading player is a typical myopic Premiership-obsessed hack attitude. They've been a lower-league club most of their days - doesn't mean they haven't had their own legends.
And Reading fans had every reason and right to give Pardew and McGee abuse - both professed loyalty and then f***ed off.
Holt's underlying motive seems to be a kind of snobbery against small clubs crashing the Premiership party. If it wasn't for teams like Reading punching above the weight the Premier League would be even duller than it already is.
We all know Madjeski's an arse. But so is Oliver Holt.
The Large One said:Spot on.
But then I've got less time for football hacks than I have for over-paid fairies diving in the area. I'm not talking about match reporters waxing lyrical about a game they are there to write about. I'm talking the drivel-laden, petty minded 'article writers' who write with an agenda for controversy - and nothing else.
As a general rule, football hacks are the biggest bunch of hangers-on and social parasites, all hanging on to the coat tails of people they write about. They're on a par with gushing 'celebrity journalists', who have little more to do that write about things most of us don't give a shit about - like the fact that Steve Coppell (quite wisel) doesn't want to talk to a bunch of hangers-on and social parasites, and would rather be with his own team.
crasher said:Couldn't agree more. Holt's brief is to write "controversial" columns but this is just bollocks from top to bottom.
Who says Hunt deliberately kneed Cech? You can' tell from watching the replay 100 times.
Coppell put out a team that got a draw at Old Trafford. (more than almost anyone else manages). What's the problem.
The fact that Holt can't name a famous Reading player is a typical myopic Premiership-obsessed hack attitude. They've been a lower-league club most of their days - doesn't mean they haven't had their own legends.
And Reading fans had every reason and right to give Pardew and McGee abuse - both professed loyalty and then f***ed off.
Holt's underlying motive seems to be a kind of snobbery against small clubs crashing the Premiership party. If it wasn't for teams like Reading punching above the weight the Premier League would be even duller than it already is.
We all know Madjeski's an arse. But so is Oliver Holt.
Dave the Gaffer said:nah...too far...nothing on it....apart from Northampton, I have done my away games for the season, I cant be arsed to go to any more........therefore COME ON IRISH
Buzzer said:Agreed - but some footie writing can be sublime when done well. Speaking as a Torygraph reader, I think Tony Francis and Henry Winter have written some fantastic pieces of prose over the years. There used to be a shop in Charings Cross that had books and books on the stuff. Fantastic.
brighton rock said:must be horrible having your club run by a boss only intrested in his own rapor
He would be, if he had done that. But he didn't. He paid for the ground himself (I'm not even sure he was on the board himself at the time) and the club's directors at the time insisted the stadium was named after him.hans kraay fan club said:Madjeski is still a cock for naming the ground after himself though.
I dunno. All I'm saying is that HE did not name that stadium after himself, and that two bit hack should have found that out before going on a rant.Man of Harveys said:So why has Majeski had other stuff that he's paid for named after himself, like the big old pouf's "Fine Rooms" at the Royal Academy, say? Was that all out of his hands too? Doubt it.
crasher said:Couldn't agree more. Holt's brief is to write "controversial" columns but this is just bollocks from top to bottom.
Who says Hunt deliberately kneed Cech? You can' tell from watching the replay 100 times.
Coppell put out a team that got a draw at Old Trafford. (more than almost anyone else manages). What's the problem.
The fact that Holt can't name a famous Reading player is a typical myopic Premiership-obsessed hack attitude. They've been a lower-league club most of their days - doesn't mean they haven't had their own legends.
And Reading fans had every reason and right to give Pardew and McGee abuse - both professed loyalty and then f***ed off.
Holt's underlying motive seems to be a kind of snobbery against small clubs crashing the Premiership party. If it wasn't for teams like Reading punching above the weight the Premier League would be even duller than it already is.
We all know Madjeski's an arse. But so is Oliver Holt.