brighton fella
New member
- Mar 20, 2009
- 1,645
They really are the worst eh? Reporting referendum votes etc.
yeh with a biased tongue.
this coming from a broadcasting company who claim to be neutral. I hope they are pleased with themselves.
They really are the worst eh? Reporting referendum votes etc.
I wouldn't disagree about your contention about the average punter, however there is a tangible link with immigration, big business and politicians, because only big business benefits from unrestricted markets.
Why else would mainstream politicians continue to ignore public concerns about immigration until the likes of UKIP have secured by-elections? It doesn't make any sense, politicians would normally court public opinion like flies are attracted to shit, yet for years public concerns have been derided (remember Gillian Duffy).
As for the Nobel peace prize, my point was that the EU and it's supporters have always been able to use economic growth and stability as the primary motive for the EU and integration.
That narrative is in tatters following the crisis in the euro zone and more pain is still to come. Yet, at the height of the crisis, when Merkel's visit to Greece descended into riots, the EU is awarded the Nobel peace prize for peace in Europe since the end of WW2.
So, now we have a new narrative for the reason for the EU, peace in Europe..........an argument that was never deployed by EU supporters before. As for whether deserved it I guess you need to look at the independence of the Committee...........here is the Chairman;
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thorbjørn_Jagland
Independent enough for you?
Indeed
This idea was proposed by a bunch of loony left wingers/greens.
It was far too draconian and the Swiss didnt buy it.
Their right wing opponents the SVP had already won earlier in the year their referendum vote to have a return of quotas on immigrants. They had even lobbied against this latest proposal.
The way forward is an immigration policy with managed realistic numbers.
Many thanks. We shall see. I meant to respond yesterday.The person was pastafarian, so you have the right bloke....it was a little bit of a strange comment that suggested to me that he was in agreement with this vote being held.
A biased tongue reporting on a referendum result after the fact? ..ok... How do you want them to report it?
for starters they only choose to report those of that opinion so as to promote their ludicrous agenda, whenever do you hear from a person with a totally opposite view than that of their own just like any other well respected broadcasting company should operate ? BBC rhetoric is so predictable it has got to the point of being cringe worthy to say the very least
your far to courteous mate treat him with the contempt he deserves.Many thanks. We shall see. I meant to respond yesterday.
What agenda do they have in accurately reporting a referendum result in Switzerland?
I see the BBC propaganda machine is hard at work again. what a load of b*llocks.
I love the way Ukippers always accuse left leaning folks of "lambasting anyone wth a different opinion to us". It's a very unsophisticated get out of jail free card for right wingers, anyone offers a differing opinion you can cry that you are being shouted down. I imagine them putting their fingers in their ears and saying "blah blah blah".
pot kettle black or what, you don't then ?
Hello Nibble,pot kettle black or what, you don't then ?
course you don't that's why you are having a rant over it.Nope.
brilliant. Loved it.Guardian readers care more about apricot recipes and barn conversions than anything else.
course you don't that's why you are having a rant over it.
an agenda to promote their ludicrous waffle...did you not read my post.