Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Albion] Cole Palmer on loan?











b.w.2.

Well-known member
Jan 8, 2004
5,189
Trouble with loans is the situation we have found ourselves in. We’ve coached Colwill to play in our system and now we probably will have to find another and go through the process again. We’ve also added millions to the Chelsea youngsters value in the process.
Is the correct answer. Let’s not make the same mistake twice
 










One Teddy Maybank

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Aug 4, 2006
22,991
Worthing
I commented on the match day thread that I was pleased to see Foden go off but was less than pleased to watch this guy pretty well takeover the role. I thought he looked a brilliant prospect, quite a few disagreed and suggested he was average though. this is the guy who came on and played out wide? More as a winger than a midfielder?

If we have to have a loan I am 100% behind this one
Still thought he was average, I’m sure we can improve him though…..
 












mejonaNO12 aka riskit

Well-known member
Dec 4, 2003
21,922
England
The being anti-loan thing is rather odd to me.

"I don't want to develop someone else's player"

So what? Why should that bother you? You can have a player, for minimal fee and make your team better, like we did with Colwill

Or

Never have the player.

After qualifying for Europa, I know which I prefer.

So what if it develops the player? You benefitted from it as well. The players only going to get a loan somewhere else (because people want good players) so we might as well be the ones to benefit from it.

And even then if you still need something else, you could argue you have put yourself at the front of the queue (assuming the loan goes well) if ever the player leaves their parent club.

No brainer.


Ps-he's quality. Yes please
 


dadams2k11

ID10T Error
Jun 24, 2011
5,024
Brighton
All those saying don't want to develop other teams players, what if teams thought that about us?

It's the name of the game and some teams have to rely on the loan market (Yes, I'm looking at you Palace) to compete.
 
Last edited:






The Fits

Well-known member
Jun 29, 2020
10,106
Given we will almost certainly sign more players on perms, which of our outstanding young players are people suggesting make way for Palmer?
 


Oh_aye

Well-known member
Jul 8, 2022
2,120
Given we will almost certainly sign more players on perms, which of our outstanding young players are people suggesting make way for Palmer?
Exactly. No way Pep will send him over to be 3rd choice. He got more games at City.
 


Rookie

Greetings
Feb 8, 2005
12,324
Good player, but would be surprised if this happened. We are well stocked in his position(s)
 


American Seagle

Well-known member
Jun 14, 2022
897
The being anti-loan thing is rather odd to me.

"I don't want to develop someone else's player"

So what? Why should that bother you? You can have a player, for minimal fee and make your team better, like we did with Colwill

Or

Never have the player.

After qualifying for Europa, I know which I prefer.

So what if it develops the player? You benefitted from it as well. The players only going to get a loan somewhere else (because people want good players) so we might as well be the ones to benefit from it.

And even then if you still need something else, you could argue you have put yourself at the front of the queue (assuming the loan goes well) if ever the player leaves their parent club.

No brainer.


Ps-he's quality. Yes please
Depends on what the loan fee ends up being. If you can sign another Caicedo, Mitoma, Gross, Veltman etc etc for the same price I would rather us spend our money on that then a loan.
Of course that assumes an either-or situation, which is probably not realistic.
 






b.w.2.

Well-known member
Jan 8, 2004
5,189
The being anti-loan thing is rather odd to me.

"I don't want to develop someone else's player"

So what? Why should that bother you? You can have a player, for minimal fee and make your team better, like we did with Colwill

Or

Never have the player.

After qualifying for Europa, I know which I prefer.

So what if it develops the player? You benefitted from it as well. The players only going to get a loan somewhere else (because people want good players) so we might as well be the ones to benefit from it.

And even then if you still need something else, you could argue you have put yourself at the front of the queue (assuming the loan goes well) if ever the player leaves their parent club.

No brainer.


Ps-he's quality. Yes please
Yes, and look at the disaster unfolding with Levi… imagine if we had insisted on a permanent when he was signed on loan? We would now have the future England LCB in the building and would make an enormous profit once sold. No, it is a very bad idea.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here