You're missing the point spectacularly.A win-win for Vorderman who flaunts her silicone assets and butt lift at every opportunity and can now appear outraged that someone has dared to remark on those things. No publicity is bad publicity etc.
You're missing the point spectacularly.A win-win for Vorderman who flaunts her silicone assets and butt lift at every opportunity and can now appear outraged that someone has dared to remark on those things. No publicity is bad publicity etc.
Its the 'gary lineker should stick to sport' argument on misogynistic steroids.
She can be 63 and wear tight fitting clothing as long as she doesnt have a view on politics.
Where Bailey has screwed up is saying that sentence out loud and meaning it and the getting annoyed when people hit back.
Was surprised (not) to read julia hartley brewer criticise her despite often wearing low cut tops etc on tv. What she wears has no bearing on whether i think her (paid for) views are good or bad. The same should be the case for vorderman
Whereas Shaun Bailey's sex pamphlet was wholesomeI hate to sound like one of those guys, but she is well known for being an ABSOLUTE GOER.
Swingers parties and all sorts. Good old Carol.
Whereas Shaun Bailey's sex pamphlet was wholesome
Whereas Shaun Bailey's sex pamphlet was wholesome
Please don't misunderstand me, and think I am #teambailey whatsoever in all of this.Whereas Shaun Bailey's sex pamphlet was wholesome
To be fair plenty of people are making a career and a decent living out of it, just by monetising "Tories bad, booooooo" type tweets. I guess it's the same for the other side also.What’s the point of arguing on Twitter? Can you ever “win”? What the point of Twitter come to mention zzzzzzzz
She appeared at a Lib Dem conference talking about electoral reform, or PR.I was a bit indifferent to Carol Vorderman until I saw her on Iaith ar Daith, partnered with that camp weatherman who plays the drums. They were a great double act and she came across as someone really engaging.
And that was before her second career as an anti-Tory agitator: she's been great in that role. I suspect that some members in the Labour party would love to find her a safe seat, but the rest of the party would think she's too much of a loose cannon.
I was a bit indifferent to Carol Vorderman until I saw her on Iaith ar Daith, partnered with that camp weatherman who plays the drums. They were a great double act and she came across as someone really engaging.
And that was before her second career as an anti-Tory agitator: she's been great in that role. I suspect that some members in the Labour party would love to find her a safe seat, but the rest of the party would think she's too much of a loose cannon.
Cheers. I was a bit wary of putting gay weatherman in Google, I wasn't sure what would come upOwain Wyn Evans
Just depends on which side you're backing doesn't it, I mean, Rachel Riley seems to do okay constantly gobbing off or litigating against any that have the temerity to disagree with her....Its the 'gary lineker should stick to sport' argument on misogynistic steroids.
She can be 63 and wear tight fitting clothing as long as she doesnt have a view on politics.
Where Bailey has screwed up is saying that sentence out loud and meaning it and the getting annoyed when people hit back.
Was surprised (not) to read julia hartley brewer criticise her despite often wearing low cut tops etc on tv. What she wears has no bearing on whether i think her (paid for) views are good or bad. The same should be the case for vorderman
You don’t want to be slating Rachel Riley on here!Just depends on which side you're backing doesn't it, I mean, Rachel Riley seems to do okay constantly gobbing off or litigating against any that have the temerity to disagree with her....
I hope she stays true to that and goes after Labour too. No Government is perfect and they’re sure to slip and need calling out, just not on a daily basis like the current rabble!She appeared at a Lib Dem conference talking about electoral reform, or PR.
Carol criticises corruption rather than a specific party, it’s just that the Tories are giving her a lot of ammunition at present.
To be fair (stupid phrase), I didn’t actually bother reading the article to get the full context.You're missing the point spectacularly.