DumLum
Well-known member
Not at all, I thought he was going to get an easy ride.
What planet do you live on?
Not at all, I thought he was going to get an easy ride.
I can't see anyone changing their minds because of this debate at all, nobody had a knockout moment or went for a KO. Cameron spoke to his fans, Ed spoke to his fans and both shored up their votes whilst poor old Clegg was the punchbag
In case you missed it :
https://vine.co/v/e7J0xnQMVvt
Clegg did Ok I thought, best of the three on the night. Dave probably did nothing good or bad to his chances, and Ed had a bad night.
What planet do you live on?
I'm a Tory, obviously however I actually felt sorry for Millie there he looked well out of his depth, he'll look a right tit if he does end up getting into bed with the SNP in any format now after what he said.
Guardian/ICM poll has Cameron as the winner.
All movement at the bookies has Cameron's odds as next PM shortening since 8pm.
It was very clever actually , the SNP have made their position clear so there doesn't have to be an agreement for them to support Labour as they've said they won't support the Tories at any cost
Labour wins it for me, even though he blatantly lost the crowd. Labour wins because Miliband seemed more honest:
It really is a total myth that Labour actually 'overspent', the debt and deficit were low(ish) and stable before the crisis, and no government EVER CUTS THE DEFICIT in the middle of a gigantic financial crisis - immediate austerity is practically impossible, and the overwhelming majority of economists agree ineffective and can lead to even higher deficits - it's called automatic fiscal stabilizers and counter-cyclical spending, you cannot compare the government to a household or a business, they are completely incomparable institutions. A household doesn't have to worry about damaging the economy when it cuts back on its spending, a government does, a household doesn't have a central bank that can expand the money supply if needed, a government does. Deficits always go high during financial crises, and they would have been high regardless of whether Labour had a balanced budget or not. Labour may have been (partially) responsible for the financial crisis, but the crisis had nothing to do with the deficit (and nothing at all with selling gold, that bald **** can **** the **** off, what an absolute ****). While many in the general public don't accept this, I like that Ed refused to concede this highly popular myth to get more support.
I also like that Ed was the only politician actually addressing what would happen if they don't win a majority (i.e. if it came to negotiating a deal with SNP, he would refuse and rather just not govern if it comes to it), and he refused to make promises he can't be certain of fulfilling (i.e. refused to promise net migration targets).
Labour wins it for me, even though he blatantly lost the crowd. Labour wins because Miliband seemed more honest:
It really is a total myth that Labour actually 'overspent', the debt and deficit were low(ish) and stable before the crisis, and no government EVER CUTS THE DEFICIT in the middle of a gigantic financial crisis - immediate austerity is practically impossible, and the overwhelming majority of economists agree ineffective and can lead to even higher deficits - it's called automatic fiscal stabilizers and counter-cyclical spending, you cannot compare the government to a household or a business, they are completely incomparable institutions. A household doesn't have to worry about damaging the economy when it cuts back on its spending, a government does, a household doesn't have a central bank that can expand the money supply if needed, a government does. Deficits always go high during financial crises, and they would have been high regardless of whether Labour had a balanced budget or not. Labour may have been (partially) responsible for the financial crisis, but the crisis had nothing to do with the deficit (and nothing at all with selling gold, that bald **** can **** the **** off, what an absolute ****). While many in the general public don't accept this, I like that Ed refused to concede this highly popular myth to get more support.
I also like that Ed was the only politician actually addressing what would happen if they don't win a majority (i.e. if it came to negotiating a deal with SNP, he would refuse and rather just not govern if it comes to it), and he refused to make promises he can't be certain of fulfilling (i.e. refused to promise net migration targets).
Guardian/ICM poll has Cameron as the winner.
All movement at the bookies has Cameron's odds as next PM shortening since 8pm.
I'm gonna quote you on the above in aprox 2 weeks the bit about not going into government.
Guardian/ICM poll has Cameron as the winner.
All movement at the bookies has Cameron's odds as next PM shortening since 8pm.