What is the point ? Sacking a few nobodies to be replaced by a few nobodies whilst the biggest twat stays as chancellor (more bad retail figures today) whilst a lib dem sacked for fraud is weaseled back in. If you or I did £40k in benefits fraud we'd be in jail not in the cabinet
Yes , derry irvine and charlie falconer were in no way tony blairs cronies were they, and how many times did he bring back mandelson? by all means criticise osborne for his performance as chancellor , but to claim that this government alone operates some sort of old boys network is totally without foundation.Happening today.
No chance that Gideon is moved on though, sadly, despite being a truly shit chancellor. #jobsfortheboys
All I'm saying is that Cameron and Osborne were best of chums. For that reason alone, I'm not expecting Cameron to EVER have the stones to sack Gideon, despite him being a shockingly TOILET chancellor.Yes , derry irvine and charlie falconer were in no way tony blairs cronies were they, and how many times did he bring back mandelson? by all means criticise osborne for his performance as chancellor , but to claim that this government alone operates some sort of old boys network is totally without foundation.
why are you posting in an ernest fashion ?All I'm saying is that Cameron and Osborne were best of chums. For that reason alone, I'm not expecting Cameron to EVER have the stones to sack Gideon, despite him being a shockingly TOILET chancellor.
What is the point ? Sacking a few nobodies to be replaced by a few nobodies whilst the biggest twat stays as chancellor (more bad retail figures today) whilst a lib dem sacked for fraud is weaseled back in. If you or I did £40k in benefits fraud we'd be in jail not in the cabinet
You are a relative newbie to this board. It was [MENTION=988]Artois[/MENTION] who STARTED this sort of THING for comical AFFECT in 2002.why are you posting in an ernest fashion ?
It's EFFECT actually.You are a relative newbie to this board. It was [MENTION=988]Artois[/MENTION] who STARTED this sort of THING for comical AFFECT in 2002.
And this chancellor was the dogs nuts wasnt he
Gordon Brown sold off Britain’s gold for between $256 and $296 an ounce, raising $3.496bn (£2.343bn at the then exchange rate). Since then the gold price has gone up more than 5 times to $1,580.70 an ounce. If the gold had not been sold it would now be worth £12.6 billion, over five times the £2.3 billion originally raised.
And this chancellor was the dogs nuts wasnt he
Gordon Brown sold off Britain’s gold for between $256 and $296 an ounce, raising $3.496bn (£2.343bn at the then exchange rate). Since then the gold price has gone up more than 5 times to $1,580.70 an ounce. If the gold had not been sold it would now be worth £12.6 billion, over five times the £2.3 billion originally raised.
Mind you Gideon has increased the National Debt by £600 billion in the 2 years hes been doing it so Gordon was a lot more frugal than the current clown
Yawn.
Who out of any of the other parties at the time said 'Dont do that Gordan because the price of gold will go up in a few years time!'
No one!
Hindsight is a fantastic tool for dishing out a beating with.
Jeremy Hunt now health secretary sums this bunch of twats up
Lansley got the boot because no one could understand what the changes of the NHS (which were not in his parties election manifesto or the coalition agreement remember) were about, why they are needed and what they will mean.
Given that he came up with the ideas and still couldnt communicate them, what chance has this other bedwetter got?!
Deckchairs on the Titanic!