Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Brilliant stuff from David Cameron today



Grombleton

Surrounded by <div>s
Dec 31, 2011
7,356
Saw this on FB earlier.

 




mikeyjh

Well-known member
Dec 17, 2008
4,607
Llanymawddwy
You're rather splitting hairs there. OK, increasing the PA by 20% will help SOME of the lowest paid more than the rich. I struggle to see how anyone of any political persuasion could think raising the PA is a bad thing.

I'm really not, I'm pointing out that the very worse off, rather than being helped, are being shafted by the policies being announced this week.
 






seagullsovergrimsby

#cpfctinpotclub
Aug 21, 2005
43,946
Crap Town
Wait until he raises VAT to 25% to pay for the tax cuts or cuts who is able to get things like Child Benefit, never realised there were so many idiots about.

I was called a scaremongering left wing looney before the GE in 2010 when I posted that VAT would most likely rise if the Tories got into power as they had previous form for this.
 




narly101

Well-known member
Feb 16, 2009
2,683
London
Anyone who votes for a party leader who makes up meeting constituents in a public park needs their head read.
 


sahel

Active member
Jan 24, 2014
225
You're rather splitting hairs there. OK, increasing the PA by 20% will help SOME of the lowest paid more than the rich. I struggle to see how anyone of any political persuasion could think raising the PA is a bad thing.

Your implicit assumption perhaps is that paying tax is a bad thing. Well you get what you pay for. Low taxation leads to poor roads. poorer education and health service, less social housing, less services for children, etc etc. It makes us a smaller US rather than a larger Scandinavian country. Personally I would rather pay more tax and live in a decent country. And the fairest tax is income tax. So why is reducing it a good thing and why as a leftish social democrat would I support raising the personal allowance unless it was accompanied by an increase in the rate
 






Buzzer

Languidly Clinical
Oct 1, 2006
26,121
Not necessarily scrap but perhaps leave more open to interpretation than they ordinarily would have been

Freedom from slavery and forced labour - Workfare
Right to a fair trial - Changes to legal aid
Respect for your private and family life, home and correspondence - an area we need to be mindful of regardless of the political party
Freedom of thought, belief and religion - I can see things taken an Islamophobic turn in freedom of religion - especially if UKIP are involved
Freedom of assembly and association - see above they've also been on pretty dodgy ground with some protests
Right to marry and start a family - not convinced that they believe in this regardless of sexual oreinatation or that it wouldn't take massive swing for them not to

I would be more inclined to agree with you if I had any faith in our establishment at the moment. It doesn't even seem to take strong suggestions of institutionalised paedophilia particuarly seriously so I thinking abill of rights might be a bit difficult for them.

The laws against forced labour were already in place before HRA and removing the HRA would not stop rights lawyers from challenging the legislation they disagree with in the high courts. We're extremely fortunate that the judiciary is completely independent from the legislative in this country and the processes for challenging would be the same with or without the HRA.

Right to a fair trial - I can't see how making changes to legal aid will diminish a single right as per Article 6 of the HRA https://www.liberty-human-rights.or...human-rights-act/article-6-right-fair-hearing

Respect for your private life...etc. Yes, we need to be vigilant but as I've said personal freedom underpins all right-wing democracies.

Islamophobia - I think you're muddling UKIP with EDL/BNP. Both the Tories and UKIP have many Muslim members and supporters. I think you're worrying for nothing.

Freedom of assembly and association - Once again, all parties are guilty of this but there's no right enshrined under the HRA that wasn't already covered by English Law. I'd also add that this is a qualified right under HRA anyway with enough caveats as to make it open to interpretation from governments.

Right to marry - they may have come late to the party but no-one's going to abolish same-sex rights now. I think at times people underestimate the support a lot of gays have for the Tories.
 




clippedgull

Hotdogs, extra onions
Aug 11, 2003
20,789
Near Ducks, Geese, and Seagulls
:lol: from Channel 4 Cameron IS evil!
 

Attachments

  • evilcameron.png
    evilcameron.png
    263.6 KB · Views: 334








seagullsovergrimsby

#cpfctinpotclub
Aug 21, 2005
43,946
Crap Town
Now by my reckoning someone on minimum wage working 40 hours a week would earn 13250 /yr so the rise in allowance from 10000 to 12500 would benefit them by 500 / year in their pocket.

With an estimated 1.2 million workers on NMW how many do you honestly think will be working 40 hours a week ? The Mirror has said somebody working full time on NMW would take 342 YEARS to earn the same money as the average CEO of one of the top 100 UK companies earns in 12 months.
 










seagullsovergrimsby

#cpfctinpotclub
Aug 21, 2005
43,946
Crap Town
My reading of that was that they want to ban 'exclusive' zero hour contracts, whereby the worker is not guaranteed any hours but not allowed to work for anyone else. These contracts could be viewed as an impediment to the operation of the 'free market', which would make it compatible with Tory beliefs. But I accept that they are really a government intervention.

I still think that this was a pretty right-wing conference, compared to the 'friendly' version of Conversatism that was being preached right up to the last election (and which has continued in recent years due to Coalition policies being announced). Yes, there's been the odd tidbit to appeal to the centre (May's reference yesterday to stop and search was another, in a very right-wing speech on security) but I think that the majority of content has been pretty far right.

My take on this is that zero hours contracts will morph into variable hours contracts ie a set number of hours per week at times when the business requires people to work with periods throughout the year when they're not busy with no set hours but allowing an employee to have a variable hours contract with (additional) employers providing there is no conflict.
 








Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here