Grombleton
Surrounded by <div>s
- Dec 31, 2011
- 7,356
Saw this on FB earlier.
You're rather splitting hairs there. OK, increasing the PA by 20% will help SOME of the lowest paid more than the rich. I struggle to see how anyone of any political persuasion could think raising the PA is a bad thing.
Freedom of thought, belief and religion - I can see things taken an Islamophobic....
Given the choice of him or Forgetful Ed i would rather have him as the lesser of two evils
Wait until he raises VAT to 25% to pay for the tax cuts or cuts who is able to get things like Child Benefit, never realised there were so many idiots about.
You're rather splitting hairs there. OK, increasing the PA by 20% will help SOME of the lowest paid more than the rich. I struggle to see how anyone of any political persuasion could think raising the PA is a bad thing.
Not necessarily scrap but perhaps leave more open to interpretation than they ordinarily would have been
Freedom from slavery and forced labour - Workfare
Right to a fair trial - Changes to legal aid
Respect for your private and family life, home and correspondence - an area we need to be mindful of regardless of the political party
Freedom of thought, belief and religion - I can see things taken an Islamophobic turn in freedom of religion - especially if UKIP are involved
Freedom of assembly and association - see above they've also been on pretty dodgy ground with some protests
Right to marry and start a family - not convinced that they believe in this regardless of sexual oreinatation or that it wouldn't take massive swing for them not to
I would be more inclined to agree with you if I had any faith in our establishment at the moment. It doesn't even seem to take strong suggestions of institutionalised paedophilia particuarly seriously so I thinking abill of rights might be a bit difficult for them.
Seems the Labourites have lost their confidence a little since last week......The tax cuts won't come in until the deficit is paid off, i.e. NEVER
For me, these two points alone throw my voting intentions into turmoil.
Now by my reckoning someone on minimum wage working 40 hours a week would earn 13250 /yr so the rise in allowance from 10000 to 12500 would benefit them by 500 / year in their pocket.
Anyone who votes for a party leader who makes up meeting constituents in a public park needs their head read.
Sellout.
My reading of that was that they want to ban 'exclusive' zero hour contracts, whereby the worker is not guaranteed any hours but not allowed to work for anyone else. These contracts could be viewed as an impediment to the operation of the 'free market', which would make it compatible with Tory beliefs. But I accept that they are really a government intervention.
I still think that this was a pretty right-wing conference, compared to the 'friendly' version of Conversatism that was being preached right up to the last election (and which has continued in recent years due to Coalition policies being announced). Yes, there's been the odd tidbit to appeal to the centre (May's reference yesterday to stop and search was another, in a very right-wing speech on security) but I think that the majority of content has been pretty far right.
Seems the Labourites have lost their confidence a little since last week......