I don’t understand what you meanPlayers weren't really relevant - it was whether he was in line with the ball that matters.
I don’t understand what you meanPlayers weren't really relevant - it was whether he was in line with the ball that matters.
Yes. His knee cap wasCompared to where the ball was played from?
Shit fan alert ^
Shit fan because shock horror I want us toShit fan alert ^
If Gross was in line with the ball when it was passed to him, it simply doesn't matter where any defenders were.I don’t understand what you mean
It's killing the game. I hate it. They can't even get penalty decisions rights.This is not what football is about. VAR has to go.
He wasn't.He was behind the ball
Why ?If Gross was in line with the ball when it was passed to him, it simply doesn't matter where any defenders were.
I’m not sure that’s conclusive. They certainly didn’t draw the line from the ball. They definitely didn’t give any indication on the TV that that was the case.Yes. His knee cap was
The number of players shouldn't affect the length of the check anything like as much as the degree of offside. In this case, based on the lines, he was about a foot offside, should take no more than 30 seconds, if that.2 players they checked - the one on the far side and the one by Gross
Because as long as he’s in line with or behind the ball being played, he’s onside.Why ?
Because the player cannot be offside if the ball is played backwards to him.Why ?
You can’t be offside if behind the ball. It was very tight.I don’t understand what you mean
Looked offside to me. Well ahead of the defender and also slightly ahead of the ball.We need much more clarity on what that decision was. They didn’t seem to draw the line from where the ball was.
Quite honestly, it looked plainly onside to me.
biggest myth in football that is not the lawBecause the player cannot be offside if the ball is played backwards to him.