Link here from an old post of mine r.e. Soton Fans arrest.
http://www.northstandchat.biz/showthread.php?threadid=24016
http://www.northstandchat.biz/showthread.php?threadid=24016
Albion Rob said:If it didn't happen they would have nothing to report on - a la World Cup 2002.
exactly wat i was thinking rob how is he suppose to prove his innocence?Albion Rob said:Unfortunately Gazwag, the papers can only report the facts and as they stand this morning they are that a Brighton and Hove Albion fan received a suspended sentence for fighting in Portugal. I agree with what you say about if he is proved to be innocent, but I can't see how that could ever happen. He has got the weight of the Portuguese police and legal ststem against him and unless he has someone videoing him throughout the whole incident he will find it near impossible to get the conviction quashed.
34064 Fighter Command said:' Innocent until proven guilty ' is all very well and good.
He has been found guilty in a court of law by a Portuguese judge.
If he were innocent, he would have been acquited along with the three who were, would you not expect ?
The BBC quoted :
" Most of the men claimed they were innocent bystanders caught up in a confrontation with the police, and denied throwing anything.
But most were identified as troublemakers by one or more of the many police witnesses to appear in court. "
There you are, identified by witnesses in a court of law.
If the whole thing was a stitch up, then the three who were acquited would have been found guilty.
34064 Fighter Command said:' Innocent until proven guilty ' is all very well and good.
He has been found guilty in a court of law by a Portuguese judge.
If he were innocent, he would have been acquited along with the three who were, would you not expect ?
The BBC quoted :
" Most of the men claimed they were innocent bystanders caught up in a confrontation with the police, and denied throwing anything.
But most were identified as troublemakers by one or more of the many police witnesses to appear in court. "
There you are, identified by witnesses in a court of law.
If the whole thing was a stitch up, then the three who were acquited would have been found guilty.
34064 Fighter Command said:I suspect much of this was because the Portuguese wanted them out of the Country as soon as possible, whether convicted or not.
At the end of the day it is only a suspended sentence, provided he continues with his good behaviour ( as most people believe he is likely to do ) then his most severe punishment will be a nationwide ban from all football matches. It may be unfair on him, but it is much less worse than a 2 year sentence inside.
I'm not taking any delight in seeing a fellow Albion fan being convicted. In fact it may well be a travesty of justice.
If it has any affect on the campaign for or against Falmer we may all end up being punished.
right there uncle buck if guilty he does deserve everything he gets lost job,trouble getting into certain countries and trouble following the albion around but if he is innocent then the bad press is probably gonna mean he'll have all these things hanging over his head anyway!! only he knows the real truth of wat happenedUncle Buck said:But his name has been all over the press, so he will proably lose his job. Now if guilty then you get everything you ask for, however certainly in Brussels there was a case of being in the wrong place at the wrong time and being rounded up.
34064 Fighter Command said:But he may have to disclose any criminal conviction to his employer anyway. Or his employer might take the view that this is unrelated to his employment ( given I assume that he was on genuine leave of absence whilst in Portugal ).
Maybe his employer will take the view he is too valuable to be dismissed, many people are convicted of worse offences and allowed to keep their job. The fact the sentence was suspended likely reflects mitigating circumstances - it's usually the case for people of previous good character that they are given suspended sentences.
But it underlines my point about him being reckless in chosing to be ' in the wrong place at the wrong time '.
you keep on about him being in the place were there had been trouble the night before but wasn't this on the 1st night of trouble that 12 were arrested of which he was 1? the 2nd nite 34 got arrested didnt they? and if there had been no trouble the previous nights how the hell was he suppose to know it was gonna kick off?34064 Fighter Command said:But he may have to disclose any criminal conviction to his employer anyway. Or his employer might take the view that this is unrelated to his employment ( given I assume that he was on genuine leave of absence whilst in Portugal ).
Maybe his employer will take the view he is too valuable to be dismissed, many people are convicted of worse offences and allowed to keep their job. The fact the sentence was suspended likely reflects mitigating circumstances - it's usually the case for people of previous good character that they are given suspended sentences.
But it underlines my point about him being reckless in chosing to be ' in the wrong place at the wrong time '.
34064 Fighter Command said:Well it certainly isn't good PR for the club is it ?
saltash seagull said:you keep on about him being in the place were there had been trouble the night before but wasn't this on the 1st night of trouble that 12 were arrested of which he was 1? the 2nd nite 34 got arrested didnt they? and if there had been no trouble the previous nights how the hell was he suppose to know it was gonna kick off?
I, too, stand corrected.saltash seagull said:you keep on about him being in the place were there had been trouble the night before but wasn't this on the 1st night of trouble that 12 were arrested of which he was 1? the 2nd nite 34 got arrested didnt they? and if there had been no trouble the previous nights how the hell was he suppose to know it was gonna kick off?