portslade seagull
Well-known member
So are you trying get time indicate that CH4 know more than the dept of work and pensions. I'm sure they know more
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
[Politics] Brexit
- Thread starter KingstonSeagull
- Start date
So are you trying get time indicate that CH4 know more than the dept of work and pensions. I'm sure they know more
Is that 2/2 from the UK? shot down in flames twice.
And May using People as chips
And May using People as chips
daveinprague
New member
They dont claim to. They claim its difficult to tell, as actual figures have not been released in any detail, as I read it.
portslade seagull
Well-known member
Mind you our own are much worse
- Apr 5, 2014
- 25,929
The EU has now put forward their offer and it far exceeds that of our government in assuring full rights. It is detailed too. It may be how I read it but the UK offer seems to fall far short.
Plus May BLOCKED this the day after the vote
There is a running theme with Brexiteers - over-promise and under-deliver. Then they wonder why people are getting pissed off and beginning to question whether this whole Brexit thing is a waste of time.
Is this today? I don't see any comment on it anywhere. Can you say where it's covered?
- Apr 5, 2014
- 25,929
ManOfSussex
We wunt be druv
Another Andrea Leadsom pearl of wisdom. 
[tweet]878324034550849536[/tweet]
[tweet]878324034550849536[/tweet]
- Jan 3, 2012
- 17,355
So,are you libelling Farage or Mandela?
I'm making disparaging comments about Farage. Mandela is widely accepted as having been an international treasure. To compare just about anybody to him is an insult to him.
Waits for torrent of accusations of Mandela being a terrorist. ....
daveinprague
New member
Only people who believe that Apartheid was right would call him a terrorist. You know, racists, who believe that a white minority should rule over the huge black majority. No other explanation other than racism.
The EU offer is what TM suggested right at the outset - keeping the status quo for EU nationals living in the UK and UK nationals living in the EU but was rejected by the EU - no negotiations on that subject until the (financial) terms of our exit were agreed. Just that the EU appear to be stipulating that the ECJ will be the final arbiter, over and above UK courts.
studio150
Well-known member
It's not down to suggestions, but actual offers and acceptance.
The offer that Mrs May made earlier this week falls someway below the EU, its not just about ECJ but the continuing freedom of movement for UK citizens living in the EU and EU citizens living in the UK. If as expected Mrs May withdraws the EU from both the single market and the free movement, then the current UK offer effectively removes the existing EU citizens right to free movement, and could also effectively landlock UK nationals currently living in the EU.
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/jun/22/theresa-may-match-eu-offer-free-movement-britons-europe
nicko31
Well-known member
Another Andrea Leadsom pearl of wisdom.
[tweet]878324034550849536[/tweet]
Yeah the likes of the Beeb need to get behind the team, go the jam, tea and biscuits Brexit.
Last edited:
OK, what TM offered last year (reciprocity) which the EU rejected. Wouldn't even discuss.
If it is like the one she offered yesterday I imagine it was rejected because it was not good enough
Not true.
But, why did she make her derisory offer at the EU summit, where Brexit wasn't being discussed, and not at the Brexit talks themselves? Genuine question.
Murray 17
Well-known member
- Jul 6, 2003
- 2,163
I thought the stumbling block is that the EU want former EU citizens covered by EU laws? But as we don't want the ECJ to have control over the UK, this won't be possible.
Another Andrea Leadsom pearl of wisdom.
[tweet]878324034550849536[/tweet]
How embarrassing.