Like the last time when he blew a safe seat?
Let's examine that 'safe seat' shall we by considering this.
The conservative election spending in South Thanet is being labelled by central government as (and I quote them) 'a calamitous administrative error' Really? So do we accept that? Accommodation expenses for many 'ground staff' bussed in by the conservatives were not part of the legal amounts candidates are allowed to use. If we don't accept that then what is the conclusion? Deliberate use of public funds to help obtain an election result for Craig Mackinlay? If so central government cannot seriously expect us to trust them as being honest with us. So if they did behave dishonestly over the seat in South Thanet then how can we believe their claims on anything including the referendum economic argument claims. Interestingly it was the successful candidate conservative Craig Mackinlay who sought to block an investigation time limit extension requested by Kent police. Surely if you won fair and square you wouldn't be worried about any investigation. Another dozen forces are also investigating in their areas too and may seek judicial extensions. So if the tories have used public money illegally that is very immoral, isn't it? Additionally the 'beak' in Kent has indicated he may void the result if it proves so. But I guess you knew all that, after all your comment seems most definite about a 'safe seat'.