Neville's Breakfast
Well-known member
Face it a weaker pound will punish those at the bottom of the pile who rely on most of their income to buy the basics. A GBP / USD is in effect the countries share price, its woven into so much of the economy
There are winners from a weak sterling, but we've devalued more than 20% more its no cause for celebration
Tory policy, maybe an untended one. But everyone knows who benefits from Tory governments
I disagree that an exchange rate is a proxy for a country's share price for reasons I have outlined
before and I am certainly not celebrating the weaker pound. I also wouldn't celebrate a stronger
pound because this would hurt our export industries. I don't think it's as simple as
pound up good, pound down bad.
I'm actually unsure as to which consumers stand to lose the most from a weaker pound. Wouldn't that be those who buy the
most imports and therefore weighted towards buyers of luxuries ? (Perhaps the champagne needed to be a champagne socialist ? as mentioned by [MENTION=34106]ManOfSussex[/MENTION] - joke btw not aimed at you or anyone else in particular). Surely a move to sourcing local goods would be good for the economy and would provide better jobs than some of the low skilled employment provided by multinationals ? I would have thought a more vibrant local economy would benefit those at the bottom of the pile every bit as much as anyone else ? I accept that this is a quick analysis that makes assumptions but that is true of your theory as well.