Good quality trolling needs a degree of subtlety or it just becomes unfunny and tedious .. hope this helps.
No trolling mate, I leave that to you right wing mob. Nice try though. Keep burying that head!
Good quality trolling needs a degree of subtlety or it just becomes unfunny and tedious .. hope this helps.
You are right that the situation in the EU is fluid but times of change are times of opportunity. For example, the Visegrad group of middle-European countries is about to argue for many things (particularly involving national sovereignty and local culture) that coincide with what the UK wants - if we weren't walking away we could have had great and growing influence in that part of the continent. And in other parts too - many in Scandinavia, the Netherlands and even Germany share that vision. We tossed away the opportunity to influence the way 'Europe' developed in the early 50s and now it seems we are making the same mistake now - our timing looks exactly and precisely wrong to me. As a Dutch acquaintance said to me in July, "we were all relying on you".
The British have had a few foreign policy disasters in my lifetime but this one worries me more than most, for this reason... for every person like you who argues cogently in favour of what is happening there seem to be plenty more singing to the hymnsheet prepared by the Daily Express and the UKIP extremes. The country is looking mean-spirited. You can discount the rise in violence against Remain supporters and eastern Europeans as the actions of a minority, but consider this: Our land of 64 million people has agreed to take in, every year until 2020, a quantity of war-battered Syrian refugees equivalent to Grimsby Town's home attendance. It is a tiny number. An opinion poll I read two days ago showed what the British people thought of this figure. The great majority of those questioned thought it was too many.
This isn't the England I love.
Meanwhile, offstage, Arron Banks is revving up with his plan for a rightwing equivalent to Momentum, a organisation to 'keep the Tories clean' as they progress along the holy path of Brexit. Some of the kippers on here will be delighted without how things are going. For those of centrist, liberal or leftist inclination this must be the worst of times.
Woah, you are tripping over yourself again !!
The people of Sunderland and Newcastle's votes are just as valid as yours, so they dont need you patronising them I am sure.
How you can even start to envisage how the markets might look in 3 years time is quite telling as I dont recall you predicting correctly how the current markets have performed in the past couple of months since Brexit so it hardly makes you our resident George Soros does it !!
You and others seem to be to be longing for some bad news, anything absolutely anything that might demonstrate that you have a view worthy of consideration, you dont so get over it.
That is not to ignore the fact that there are more Polish nationals in UK prisons than any other nation
Great post . And accurate. We need a bit more straight talking like this on here rather than snide posts from the usual suspects.
I'm not patronising their vote at all, they voted for a change in the hope that it might affect them positively. What then happens when they find that nothing has changed for them. It was said they voted out as a way of protesting that they felt left behind and abandoned with no voice and no hope, what happens when Brexit delivers little or no change ?
Pot, kettle and black Nibble.
I GUARANTEE you 90% of people in Sunderland and Newcastle who voted leave can't tell you how much EU funding their respective areas will lose IF brexit occurs.
Actually I'm not, I'm looking for a governing body that combats wealth disparity by investing in deprived areas. The EU does this. UK governments rarely do.
A true capitalist speaking. How do YOU know they voting around their own economic prosperity ? Maybe like me they thought the hit was worth taking ?
I would class calling someone by the wrong user name continuously counts as snidey. Anyhow, you are categorically known as an unpleasant troll on here, in fact I saw someone calling you out on it yesterday or today on one of Mizen's politically retarded threads. So, shhhhhh.
Cheers JC. Saves me posting similarI'll have a go at answering if you don't mind.
1) making our own decisions:
If we want to sell to the US we have to meet set standards as we do with numerous other nations which is why many standards are pretty universal and of course companies/businesses currently trading within the EU single market already meet the standards. Plus of course you realise that a very very small percentage of UK companies export to the EU but 100% of all UK companies have to comply with EU regulations undoubtedly adding excessive costs. So to get back to your 'making our own decisions' query ... when Brexit is finalised it is entirely feasible as many as 95% of UK companies will no longer have to comply with unnecessary burdensome EU regulations. In future it is much more likely the regulations they follow will be set by the UK government/authorities, which looks a bit like making our own decisions to me.
http://forbritain.org/britishoption.pdf
Your Tory government removing the minimum wage point or indeed a Tory government introducing a more generous living wage would be an example of our democratically elected government enacting policy ... ie the UK making it's own decisions.
2) governing ourselves:
I don't recognise your definition of nearly all and in your previous point you seemed to be suggesting staying in the EU was going to stop a government you didn't vote for enact policy you didn't like. So you tacitly admit Brexit will indeed give us more self governance.
https://fullfact.org/europe/uk-law-what-proportion-influenced-eu/
3) Getting back our identity
As sovereignty and nation states powers are constantly diminished as they are after every EU treaty is signed it is reasonable to say our identity is also being changed/diluted. Basically more EU = less nation states (UK) which some remainers are entirely happy with and welcome. On the immigration point it it would also be fair to say adding millions of EU citizens over a relatively short period to a country would bring change especially in those areas that had absorbed higher levels of immigration.
Hope this qualifies as a proper answer.
You post in the same style as Nibble, you hold the same views as Nibble, you started posting when Nibble disappeared, and you appear as retarded as Nibble. Shall we ask [MENTION=6886]Bozza[/MENTION] to check if you both use the same IP range ? I'm not the only only that believes you are Nibble.
Surely a tongue in cheek smiley or a pot kettle is needed in this post.Great post . And accurate. We need a bit more straight talking like this on here rather than snide posts from the usual suspects.
Surely a tongue in cheek smiley or a pot kettle is needed in this post.
At least I post under one username. Try it.We hardly need it what with you and the other FAIRY GODFATHERS personally policing EVERY post on these threads.
At least I post under one username. Try it.
Actually I'm not, I'm looking for a governing body that combats wealth disparity by investing in deprived areas. The EU does this. UK governments rarely do.
I'm not patronising their vote at all, they voted for a change in the hope that it might affect them positively. What then happens when they find that nothing has changed for them. It was said they voted out as a way of protesting that they felt left behind and abandoned with no voice and no hope, what happens when Brexit delivers little or no change ?
It just seems strange that you identify Sunderland and Newcastle in your example rather say our on local regions that voted similarly, what are Sunderland and Newcastle going to miss out on that all the other areas assume they might benefit from leaving.
Its a bit like saying, 'it will just be rubbish', without much thought.