- Jan 3, 2012
- 17,336
That’s a very bland response to a post where I was very strongly rejecting what I thought was the main point of your original post.All referendums are advisory in that sense. There is a fairly significant minority of people who would have been happy to stay in the EU on the grounds that the referendum was only advisory, but I suspect that was not a matter of principle, only a matter of wanting to stay. I suspect their principles would not have extended to a Johnson or other government pulling out of the EU if the referendum had voted to stay, but of course the principle is exactly the same.
I understand the arguments that the EU referendum and the Scottish referendum should have been on more than a simple majority view, but I think in both cases it was right to do it that way. But the next vote, and all subsequent votes, now that the people have been consulted, should be as you say on a higher threshhold.
but the significance, the import, the fundamental importance of the question being asked in that referendum IS PRECISELY WHY it should not have been a straight majority decision.