- Jul 10, 2003
- 27,786
The geo-politics above is all true of course.
But where we go from here is important.
We have to fulfill the result of the referendum, simply asking again rips society further apart and will only be the answer if another referendum delivers a large majority either way.
If remain marginally wins, then the anger from half of society will not just melt away. Further poison added, and anger ramped up. Many more Farage-s will start dominating our politics.
I tend to follow the lead of arch europhile Ken Clarke. We simply have to leave the EU. Do it in the most orderly way possible, and then fix the future.
I differ from Clarke in that I think that Norway and in particular Switzerland have a better relationship with the EU than if they were members and subject to the imposition of Qualified Majority Voting results.
But however we end up fixing the future, it isn't by stirring up more division and letting Farage out of his box - his recent relative silence has been a gift to us all.
I know that you want to leave, your reasons why and your preferred leave option, which you have explained clearly. Your solution is implementable but will, I believe still have a significant economic impact for the geo-political reasons you agree with above. Not as disastrous as some other leave options, but still significant. Together with the further years of turmoil whilst this is all negotiated, I can't see that this will do anything but make Britain, and most certainly Britain's poorest, far worse off. Consequently, I believe we should remain.
As you rightly say, the country is currently divided and will be for years. Given this, surely we should make sure that whatever flavour of Leave is decided upon still commands the majority of the electorate (if, indeed, it ever did). If there is a significant majority one way or the other, it can only help by proving the size of the majority, and if there isn't there is still a mandate for whichever result. I don't believe that 'Leave' is a mandate for a hard Brexit, and I know you agree. So why should 'Leave' be a mandate for EFTA membership ?
Given the state of the country currently, there is nothing to lose and everything to gain by having a second referendum with detailed, implementable options.
And, your solution isn't any sort of compromise. It is the same solution you have wanted since the beginning and it's 'Leave'
It is good to discuss this with an informed Leave supporter who doesn't just accuse everyone of insulting them
Last edited: