Pretty pink fairy
Banned
- Jan 30, 2008
- 31,981
Bercow and his side kicks ??Excellent - so we'll get our petrol from Russia, and chicken from the US. Whats not to worry about?
Regards
DW
Bercow and his side kicks ??Excellent - so we'll get our petrol from Russia, and chicken from the US. Whats not to worry about?
The fact that people like you believe this is a very good reason for not holding over simplistic, badly thought-through plebicites. If we never held one again after this Brexit mess is resolved, it would be 50 billion years too soon.We are not allowed to leave. It's not up to us.
What is your definition of 'good'?
It's not simple at all. If you could get agreement that we should have a second vote on Brexit, and there are some very basic reasons why that would be wrong, but if you could start down that path, those same MP's will not agree on what the terms of the vote are. I admire the fact that you would allow no deal to be on the ballet. Well MP's wouldn't allow it. It would be "Soft Brexit" (with terms which would go against the principle things people voted for, i.e. leaving the CU, the SM, the ECJ etc) or Remain, and that is the only vote they would ever allow.
Don't you get it? We are not allowed to leave the EU. We were asked on the basis that we were expected to give the "right answer".
We are not allowed to leave. It's not up to us.
The fact that people like you believe this is a very good reason for not holding over simplistic, badly thought-through plebicites. If we never held one again after this Brexit mess is resolved, it would be 50 billion years too soon.
Whether you believe MPs are dishonestly choosing not to uphold the result, or that it was a question that was simply too complex to just put to the people with a simple Yes/No, this referendum has badly damaged democracy in this country.
better or best. having admirable, pleasing, superior, or positive qualities; not negative, bad or mediocre
Seriously though, if you no idea what the best possible (good) deal is, how do you know one is possible to come up with in two years, or are you just assuming?
Ultimately, its not that the EU has us by the short and curlies, it really is the reality of the Irish border - did people really think magic fairies were going to make trade from an EU country into NI frictionless while the mainland UK to the EU operates under some WTO rules in the event of No Deal? It's nonsense. Complete delusion.
The unpalatable backstop in the deal to hardline Tories, something we've known about for a year has had no firm alternative put forward. Nothing. No reasonable working solution. Threatening No Deal is simply unworkable given the world knows a return to border checks on the Irish mainland is unthinkable, the GFA cannot be thrown to the wayside - you can kiss goodbye to any US trade deal if you did.
The only politicians serving their self interest at the moment is the Tory front bench. Prepared to burn Rome to the ground to get what they want.
17M+ voters cheated. This is not the end, but trust in our politicians is at a BIG FAT ZERO now.
Why don't these politicians just tell the truth, they have no intention of us ever leaving the EU.
It's not simple at all. If you could get agreement that we should have a second vote on Brexit, and there are some very basic reasons why that would be wrong, but if you could start down that path, those same MP's will not agree on what the terms of the vote are. I admire the fact that you would allow no deal to be on the ballet. Well MP's wouldn't allow it. It would be "Soft Brexit" (with terms which would go against the principle things people voted for, i.e. leaving the CU, the SM, the ECJ etc) or Remain, and that is the only vote they would ever allow.
Don't you get it? We are not allowed to leave the EU. We were asked on the basis that we were expected to give the "right answer".
We are not allowed to leave. It's not up to us.
It's not simple at all. If you could get agreement that we should have a second vote on Brexit, and there are some very basic reasons why that would be wrong, but if you could start down that path, those same MP's will not agree on what the terms of the vote are. I admire the fact that you would allow no deal to be on the ballet. Well MP's wouldn't allow it. It would be "Soft Brexit" (with terms which would go against the principle things people voted for, i.e. leaving the CU, the SM, the ECJ etc) or Remain, and that is the only vote they would ever allow.
Don't you get it? We are not allowed to leave the EU. We were asked on the basis that we were expected to give the "right answer".
Here's a little test for you. Ask a number of Leave voters to explain what these terms are yet alone what they mean. And yet they voted for them? Are you sure? Did they vote for all of the them or one or two of them?
Or were they simply motivated by the simplistic and (meaningless) slogan 'take back control'? May's deal was arguably taking back control. Soft Brexit (the same as May's deal in your view??) arguably takes back control. Your position lacks coherence.
Whether you believe MPs are dishonestly choosing not to uphold the result, or that it was a question that was simply too complex to just put to the people with a simple Yes/No, this referendum has badly damaged democracy in this country.
The fact that people like you believe this is a very good reason for not holding over simplistic, badly thought-through plebicites. If we never held one again after this Brexit mess is resolved, it would be 50 billion years too soon.
Whether you believe MPs are dishonestly choosing not to uphold the result, or that it was a question that was simply too complex to just put to the people with a simple Yes/No, this referendum has badly damaged democracy in this country.
I didn't ask for a dictionary definition of good. I simply wondered what your definition of a good Brexit deal was?
Cheers. You are quite smart, aren't you?
Here's a little test for you. Ask a number of Leave voters to explain what these terms are yet alone what they mean. And yet they voted for them? Are you sure? Did they vote for all of the them or one or two of them?
Or were they simply motivated by the simplistic and (meaningless) slogan 'take back control'? May's deal was arguably taking back control. Soft Brexit (the same as May's deal in your view??) arguably takes back control. Your position lacks coherence.
It wasn't "too complex". We could have left by now, and any short term shock to the system would have been over with by now and it would be done.
I was a fool for ever believing the vote would be respected.
Excellent - so we'll get our petrol from Russia, and chicken from the US. Whats not to worry about?
Yeah, we've all heard it. People who didn't vote to leave the EU telling those who did vote to leave why they did, and that they didn't understand what they were voting for.
Well at least some people have representation in Parliament, sadly, it isn't the majority though.
We are allowed to EU, The MPs who have blocked have said they are more than happy to leave with a deal, a deal we have to come up with not this no deal rubbish.
Once again, if it was not for the ERG we would be out of the EU.