Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Politics] Brexit

If there was a second Brexit referendum how would you vote?


  • Total voters
    1,099






beorhthelm

A. Virgo, Football Genius
Jul 21, 2003
36,018
Has anybody seen a strong rationale for Remain that is NOT driven solely by economics? I might have missed it.

There's plenty out there. Google is your friend.

so thats a "no" then. it is striking that Remain have never made a case for being in the EU, instead they've made a great deal about why you should be against leaving. even within the economic context, its all about what you'd lose if you leave, not how you benefit if you remain. they have never made a case for freedom of movement, closer integration, etc.

instead when pushed they try to claim core tenets of membership don't really apply to the UK, we're going to have a special deal with the EU, promise. but we already know that isn't viable because no undertakings agreed are in a treaty, many nations opposed them and will do so formally when it comes up for the next treaty.
 


beorhthelm

A. Virgo, Football Genius
Jul 21, 2003
36,018


5ways

Well-known member
Sep 18, 2012
2,217
Blinded by titles, appeals from authority and so it continues ...

George Akerlof

Asymmetrical information

Kenneth Arrow

Social choice theory

Angus Deaton

Consumption, poverty and welfare

Peter Diamond

Labour market search and match

James Heckman

Statistical methods to correct selection bias

Eric Maskin

Mechanism design theory

James Mirrlees

Moral hazard, asymmetrical information and optimal taxation theory

Christopher Pissarides

Labour market search and match

Robert Solow

Exogenous growth model

Jean Tirole

Dual sided markets

All very bright men and all Nobels thoroughly deserved for excellent work and insights. And yet none of them really experts in the precise details of the subject under discussion. We are rather here akin to discussing how to treat cancer with some of the world’s best orthopedists, heart surgeons and urologists rather than with an oncologist.

But the real error here is the failure to properly consider Bastiat. The choice to be made on Thursday is not whether we remain within the European Union as it is or set sail into the uncertain seas of restored sovereignty (also known as we get to do what we want not what they want). Rather, our choice is whether to continue sailing in the SS European Union off to that proposed nirvana of a centralised continental superstate with a common treasury, the idiocy of the euro and fiscal union, or whether we decide to take matters into our own hands and protect ourselves from such nonsenses
.

I would rather appeal to authority than appeal to ignorance. Gove 'sick of experts' sums up the whole anti-intellectual stance of the Leave campaign. As Phillip Pullman said

"Re Michael Gove's disdain for 'experts: when a clever man starts advocating stupidity he's after something, and we should watch him."
 






By voting to stay in the EU we are giving the commissioners a mandate to push things through at their will. Cameron has proved already he has no power and no courage to stand up for our rights. We will be pushed into greater union, we will be pushed into the Euro, Turkey will be fast tracked into some sought of travel free arrangement, we will have a Euro "defense force", we will be paying up to equalise the finances of the 28 member states. I absolutely guarantee this will happen in the next 10 years. We are being sold down the river by spivs and beurocrats.


Sent from my E6653 using Tapatalk
 


Bold Seagull

strong and stable with me, or...
Mar 18, 2010
30,464
Hove
so thats a "no" then. it is striking that Remain have never made a case for being in the EU, instead they've made a great deal about why you should be against leaving. even within the economic context, its all about what you'd lose if you leave, not how you benefit if you remain. they have never made a case for freedom of movement, closer integration, etc.

instead when pushed they try to claim core tenets of membership don't really apply to the UK, we're going to have a special deal with the EU, promise. but we already know that isn't viable because no undertakings agreed are in a treaty, many nations opposed them and will do so formally when it comes up for the next treaty.

Okay, the flip side is why haven't Leave made a practical case of what our deal with Europe outside the EU will look like?

The Leave campaign have often cited Norway and Switzerland as examples of trading with Europe outside the EU, but in the case of Norway, their deal to be in the EEA involves them agreeing to the free movement of the Schengen Zone. They have more EU immigration than us, and have no say on any matters within the EU. They are for all intents and purposes in the EU without having any say in it.

The Leave campaign, could easily have set out a strong economic case for Britain's relationship with Europe outside the EU, however this almost certainly would have involved admitting that any deal to be in the EEA would be accepting free movement as we have now. However, that would reveal that the foundation of Brexit of controlled immigration is likely to be a fallacy. Other countries like Switzerland and Norway have to accept EU free movement when negotiating their individual trade agreements.

For many Leaver's, such as in the Telegraph yesterday, this is a frustrating criticism of the Leave campaign. For them the economic case could have been fought on much stronger ground if the immigration card had been dropped. The short term calculation of voters going for 'controlled immigration' is likely to backfire if it loses more voters for a poor economic case.
 
Last edited:


5ways

Well-known member
Sep 18, 2012
2,217
By voting to stay in the EU we are giving the commissioners a mandate to push things through at their will. Cameron has proved already he has no power and no courage to stand up for our rights. We will be pushed into greater union, we will be pushed into the Euro, Turkey will be fast tracked into some sought of travel free arrangement, we will have a Euro "defense force", we will be paying up to equalise the finances of the 28 member states. I absolutely guarantee this will happen in the next 10 years. We are being sold down the river by spivs and beurocrats.


Sent from my E6653 using Tapatalk


Nope. We have no ever closer union, a referendum on any powers transferred to Brussels, and a Euro opt-out. Still no evidence of an EU army.
 




pb21

Well-known member
Apr 23, 2010
6,688
it is striking that Remain have never made a case for being in the EU.

Er, yes they have?!

Have you actually read or listened to anything the remain camp have said? The remain moto is "stronger, better off and safer" just for starters! Everyday they go on about how being part of the EU enables us a to act in ways we couldn’t if we left. The increased workers rights environmental protection etc. etc. etc. ad infinitum...
 




Nope. We have no ever closer union, a referendum on any powers transferred to Brussels, and a Euro opt-out. Still no evidence of an EU army.
There was a moment in the dimberley debate last night when Cameron was getting a grilling. He said a telling line" I will not be prime minister by then" He can walk away and let someone else sign away the UK.
We will join the Euro and will take part in every aspect of EU membership. The UK will cease to be an independent country. We will be the 33rd state of the USofE.

Sent from my E6653 using Tapatalk
 












pastafarian

Well-known member
Sep 4, 2011
11,902
Sussex
I'll bite. Why won't it? If the majority vote for leave, surely the majority are dead against the EU. With Gove, Johnson and Farage's rhetoric, them as leaders of the country will try and fight the EU until the end. To what end? I guess it depends how much you believe the Express maybe?

you do realise this is a vote for IN or OUT dont you?
this isnt a vote for Gove Johnson and Farage to be leaders of the country.

there was a wally on the radio recently saying he was voting remain because he didnt want farage running the country if we leave.
i wonder how many other wallies are out there not understanding how elections work
 


Neville's Breakfast

Well-known member
May 1, 2016
13,450
Oxton, Birkenhead
I would rather appeal to authority than appeal to ignorance. Gove 'sick of experts' sums up the whole anti-intellectual stance of the Leave campaign. As Phillip Pullman said

"Re Michael Gove's disdain for 'experts: when a clever man starts advocating stupidity he's after something, and we should watch him."

I do think this debate on experts is rather pointless. Experts are clearly just that ie experts. There is no disdain for their abilities or their opinions. Rather, the point is being made that we cannot run a society by asking their opinion and just going ahead. Do you remember the collapse of the LTCM hedge fund in 1998 ? Two of the traders/owners were Myron Scholes and Robert Merton, eminent economists who pretty much wrote option theory which is widely used in financial markets and for instance the pricing of insurance risk. They nearly brought down the world economy !! I am grateful for the opinion of economists but in this instance I feel that they are not factoring in the most important issues to me because they do not see my issues as a negative. Therefore the alternative to your 'appeal to authority' is not an 'appeal to ignorance', it is simply a different world view and having such disdain for it will not advance this debate.
 




portslade seagull

Well-known member
Jul 19, 2003
17,949
portslade
you do realise this is a vote for IN or OUT dont you?
this isnt a vote for Gove Johnson and Farage to be leaders of the country.

there was a wally on the radio recently saying he was voting remain because he didnt want farage running the country if we leave.
i wonder how many other wallies are out there not understanding how elections work

Od dear they need to realise Cameron will still be in a job as will anybody else involved. Nothing will change until 2020 at the earliest. Pessimistic remain lot. Maybe the ABBA song would be more appropriate money money money is all that matters to them
 




El Presidente

The ONLY Gay in Brighton
Helpful Moderator
Jul 5, 2003
40,008
Pattknull med Haksprut
so thats a "no" then. it is striking that Remain have never made a case for being in the EU, instead they've made a great deal about why you should be against leaving. even within the economic context, its all about what you'd lose if you leave, not how you benefit if you remain. they have never made a case for freedom of movement, closer integration, etc.

instead when pushed they try to claim core tenets of membership don't really apply to the UK, we're going to have a special deal with the EU, promise. but we already know that isn't viable because no undertakings agreed are in a treaty, many nations opposed them and will do so formally when it comes up for the next treaty.


There's plenty of good reasons

Access to a free capital, labour and trade market that helps generate jobs and attract inward investment
Collaboration on science and research funded across the EU for universities
Acting in concert against Russia with trade sanctions in relation to the conflict with the Ukraine
Environmental legislation to achieve cleaner beaches
A competition policy that prevents large global companies from dictating terms to individual countries
Reaching out to the east of Europe in the collapse of the soviet regime to encourage democracy
 




Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here