Bold Seagull
strong and stable with me, or...
Damn, missed it by 1.
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
[Politics] Brexit
- Thread starter KingstonSeagull
- Start date
nicko31
Well-known member
Where will they now pay tax?
Oh bless, you're trying to pretend laughing will help your argument, but it won't. Don't worry petal, I'm multi-quoting, so you can do what you do every time you lose an argument, and say 'oh you're multi-quoting so I'm not going to discuss it any more'Oh Trig , Trig, Trig.
Go on, try and quote where I said we may have a better free trade deal with the EU. Go on. Oh no, you can't, because it didn't happen. You just got confused because you don't have a basic grasp of English
You underestimated me.
Oh bless, you're trying to pretend laughing will help your argument, but it won't. Don't worry petal, I'm multi-quoting, so you can do what you do every time you lose an argument, and say 'oh you're multi-quoting so I'm not going to discuss it any more'
Go on, try and quote where I said we may have a better free trade deal with the EU. Go on. Oh no, you can't, because it didn't happen. You just got confused because you don't have a basic grasp of English
Lovely stuff. You don’t disappoint, old boy.
Baker lite
Banned
BrExit - the countdown to 11PM GMT on Friday 29th of March 2019
You are quite the charmer aren’t you?No, in fact you’re a despicable waste of Jizm.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
You are quite the charmer aren’t you?No, in fact you’re a despicable waste of Jizm.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Yeah, didn't think so pal.
You're better than that HT.
Bold Seagull
strong and stable with me, or...
Do you do it on purpose, or was it rhetorically necessary?
Blue Valkyrie
Not seen such Bravery!
Which bit?
Bold Seagull
strong and stable with me, or...
6 quotes instead of 5? (you did see I predicted 5 a few pages back right?)
- Jul 10, 2003
- 27,772
Trig, in this instance you're wrong.
And as I'm sure you know, I can't be arsed to argue on a point of pedantry which is completely irrelevant to the point that Dyson knew exactly what he was doing by moving his HQ
And as I'm sure you know, I can't be arsed to argue on a point of pedantry which is completely irrelevant to the point that Dyson knew exactly what he was doing by moving his HQ
Last edited:
I see the ego that is Tony Blair is telling us that he wants a people’s vote from his trip to Davos continuing to poke his heinous beak where it don’t belong.
Yes I saw you predicted 5. I didn't make it 6 on purpose, that's just what fit.
Oh **** me another one. Oh how I wish I was. But I'm not.
This is very simple. TB claimed that the reason Dyson was moving is because Dyson will have more access to European markets from Singapore than from the UK. I pointed it's wrong to claim they'll have better access, as if it's a fact, because we don't yet know if they will have more access to the European markets or not.
That's it. And obviously I'm correct, we don't yet know. We're not even 100% sure we're leaving the EU yet. And if we do, we're not sure we won't have a free trade agreement. So go on Watford, explain how you know for a fact that the UK won't have a free trade deal with the EU.
Last edited:
Baker lite
Banned
I see the ego that is Tony Blair is telling us that he wants a people’s vote from his trip to Davos continuing to poke his heinous beak where it don’t belong.
I would do time for that ****.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
I see the ego that is Tony Blair is telling us that he wants a people’s vote from his trip to Davos continuing to poke his heinous beak where it don’t belong.
All the times Boris Johnson has contradicted his own argument for Brexit
That covers a lot of ground.......hey you cover a lot of ground yourself.
- Jan 18, 2009
- 4,885
So you say, but like deaths and taxes, one other certainty in life is that the EU doesn’t stand still on it’s journey to a fully federalised state. If anyone is in any doubt about an EU army, here it is in Guy Verhofstadt’s own words......
https://mobile.twitter.com/guyverhofstadt/status/1062433746123739136?lang=en
A couple of points having views this clip.
1) He refers to a new Europe, a “sovereign” Europe, now to be “sovereign” ordinarily that’s a state with a single centralised Government. There’s no doubting what he means is there?
I know remainers love to deny facts but this one is as plain as the parting on his head. Member states can’t be sovereign in a sovereign Europe, so let’s start with the benefits of this new EU that Guy is extolling.........wots da beeg oydeeya?
2) His style at the rostrum, with that jerky arm movement.......I’m sure I’ve seen that before.......remind you of anyone?
Baldseagull
Well-known member
http://www.striking-women.org/modul...present/maternity-and-paternity-leave-and-pay
The UK introduced its first maternity leave legislation through the Employment Protection Act 1975, which was extended through further legislation, such as The Employment Act 1980. However, for the first 15 years, only about half of working women were eligible for it because of long qualifying periods of employment. In 1993, coverage was extended to all working women, in order to bring Britain into compliance with a European Commission directive on this issue. In 2003, male employees received paid statutory paternity leave for the first time, an entitlement that was extended in January 2010.