It doesn’t matter what you think you voted for, what you voted for was to leave the EU - this deal does it.
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
[Politics] Brexit
- Thread starter KingstonSeagull
- Start date
It doesn’t matter what you think you voted for, what you voted for was to leave the EU - this deal does it.
Pretty pink fairy
Banned
- Jan 30, 2008
- 31,981
You have indeed
You say 'no deal'.
I ask what would you do about all the things you would need to do to implement your fantasy
The negotiation of our new schedules and quotas with the WTO
The NI/Ireland Border
The New customs posts
The new Lorry Parks at all ports
The design, building and testing of the new IT systems to run the WTO tariffs and rules
The recruitment and training of the new staff to run the new systems/rules etc
And you say 'I don't know' or you run away, and expect someone else to clear up the shit you've left behind.
Well you are certainly following your leadership of Nige, Boris and JRM to the letter
Of course there will be teething problems , the way you bang on about it's as if it will last for eternity , still dreaming of that Norway soft of softest Brexit? leave means leave, looks like it will probably be on a no deal so it's best you look in that piece of tat for a new prediction
regards
DR
Pretty pink fairy
Banned
- Jan 30, 2008
- 31,981
this , Sadly the grizzlers try to convince themselves that wasn't case in a hope it will make them feel better about their non argument
regards
DR
No you didn't.
You voted to 'leave'. Nothing else. No details.
You won. get over it.
Two Professors
Two Mad Professors
Watching 'Horrid Henry' with my grandson.You sound just like him,HH that is.Nah nah nah nah nah nah
Watching 'Horrid Henry' with my grandson.You sound just like him,HH that is.Nah nah nah nah nah nah
melias shoes
Well-known member
- Oct 14, 2010
- 4,830
No,I voted out completely. Out of the EU. Completely. Not half in half out. Out. Nothing else. Yes I did. Get over it.
Did you have a different voting slip?
melias shoes
Well-known member
- Oct 14, 2010
- 4,830
It was also stated loud and clear that Leave means leave. I understood it why can't you?
melias shoes
Well-known member
- Oct 14, 2010
- 4,830
I think you'll find that us leave voters when we voted it was to leave lock,stock and barrel. Why is that hard for you to grasp?
I think you are having the issues of understanding what you voted for, leaving the EU - which is what May's deal does.
What you think you voted for means nothing, it wasnt an option
stay in the EU
Leave the EU - once again, May's deal has us leaving the EU.
It really is not that difficult to understand, I am sorry if you thought you voted for some mythical other option.
I guess that explains the anger, maybe try and find the JRM/Boris/Nigel who lied to you.
- Jul 10, 2003
- 27,766
So not only do you not understand what it is you are asking for in a WTO 'no deal', you don't even understand what you voted for
Last edited:
- Jul 10, 2003
- 27,766
Of course there will be teething problems , the way you bang on about it's as if it will last for eternity , still dreaming of that Norway soft of softest Brexit? leave means leave, looks like it will probably be on a no deal so it's best you look in that piece of tat for a new prediction
regards
DR
Bless, confused again. I'll try and explain simply.
There were two choices on the referendum.
You voted for Theresa May's soft Brexit plan.
I voted to remain.
Last edited:
Garry Nelson's teacher
Well-known member
Local authorities should set up “food resilience teams” to prepare for different Brexit scenarios, according to an advice notice written by food policy experts.
The document – from specialists at City, University of London, University of Sussex and the Chartered Institute of Environmental Health (CIEH) – has been sent to every council in the United Kingdom, and will be available online.
It suggests authorities should consider creating the food resilience teams to make risk assessments of how different outcomes of Brexit might affect food provision and supply in their local areas.
The briefing, which is the latest in the Food Brexit Briefing series from the Food Research Collaboration, advises that councils will have a role to play as the local voice and ears to help limit the risk of social disorder, which has been brought on by food supply problems in the past.
There is wide agreement within local authorities that some level of preparation for food supply after Brexit is both possible and sensible, according to the document.
The advice notice suggests food resilience teams should:
• Map existing food systems in their regions
• Conduct rapid assessments of where risks and potential disruptions lie
• Clarify the limits to stockpiling
• Bring together relevant professionals and expertise
• Be prepared to convey this information to the Government and public.
The notice highlights local authorities’ responsibility for the enforcement of food safety and standards regulation, with a scope ranging from school meals to imported and exported products.
However, it says the Government’s guidance notes for a no-deal Brexit are “welcome but inadequate” and warns that local authorities have not been given enough advice.
According to the notice, every form of Brexit will affect the food system in some way, particularly a no-deal scenario.
Several food risks are highlighted, including: price changes, reduced food availability, lower standards and safety, supply disruption, border delays, freight logistics and public disorder.
The document – from specialists at City, University of London, University of Sussex and the Chartered Institute of Environmental Health (CIEH) – has been sent to every council in the United Kingdom, and will be available online.
It suggests authorities should consider creating the food resilience teams to make risk assessments of how different outcomes of Brexit might affect food provision and supply in their local areas.
The briefing, which is the latest in the Food Brexit Briefing series from the Food Research Collaboration, advises that councils will have a role to play as the local voice and ears to help limit the risk of social disorder, which has been brought on by food supply problems in the past.
There is wide agreement within local authorities that some level of preparation for food supply after Brexit is both possible and sensible, according to the document.
The advice notice suggests food resilience teams should:
• Map existing food systems in their regions
• Conduct rapid assessments of where risks and potential disruptions lie
• Clarify the limits to stockpiling
• Bring together relevant professionals and expertise
• Be prepared to convey this information to the Government and public.
The notice highlights local authorities’ responsibility for the enforcement of food safety and standards regulation, with a scope ranging from school meals to imported and exported products.
However, it says the Government’s guidance notes for a no-deal Brexit are “welcome but inadequate” and warns that local authorities have not been given enough advice.
According to the notice, every form of Brexit will affect the food system in some way, particularly a no-deal scenario.
Several food risks are highlighted, including: price changes, reduced food availability, lower standards and safety, supply disruption, border delays, freight logistics and public disorder.
So not only do you not understand what it is you are asking for in a WTO 'no deal', you don't even understand what you voted for
Even JRM has stopped calling Mays deal not what they voted for
Pretty pink fairy
Banned
- Jan 30, 2008
- 31,981
because they're sore losers who thought they were sooooooooooooo much ITK about everyone's views on the referendum. turned out well for them didn't it
regards
DR
Pretty pink fairy
Banned
- Jan 30, 2008
- 31,981
Last edited:
Pretty pink fairy
Banned
- Jan 30, 2008
- 31,981
Lincoln Imp
Well-known member
- Feb 2, 2009
- 5,964
Because there is no evidence that it is true, untrue or half true?
Two Professors
Two Mad Professors
This G20 is a right farce.The Argies didn't bother meeting Macron's plane,not important enough.When the Indian PM landed,their TV split/screened the plane landing with a picture of Apu from the Simpsons.I don't think Merkel has even got there yet-Luftwaffe One (Konrad Adenauer) broke down on the way and they'd sold the reserve plane (Theodor Eike) to the Iranians.