beorhthelm
A. Virgo, Football Genius
- Jul 21, 2003
- 36,014
So food will be cheaper overall? Is that what you are saying?
that would be the expectation of tariff free trade.
So food will be cheaper overall? Is that what you are saying?
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...talks-vote-against-lib-dem-tory-a8003186.html
David Davis thinks a lot of himself doesn't he, demanding things of opposition parties. Cock.
That bloke is a cock of the highest order
Next thing up, is an attempt to do some gerrymandering on constituency boundaries, they seem to forget they have no majority and not even the DUP will support them
The proposed boundary changes projected on June's election would have made Sinn Fein the largest party in Northern Ireland in terms of Westminster seats.
Canada doesn't have to pay a membership fee or adhere to free movement of people, but they got a free trade deal. You can't apply these rules to Canada and the EU to tell us we couldn't have the same sort of deal.
he's probably right. its becoming clear that its too late, we're already too entrenched into the EU system to extract ourselves gracefully. prehaps we should instead sue for peace and try to come to some agreement that we dont have to continue on the interventionist path, that we remain outside the Euro, outside of centralised fiscal policy, foreign policy, army etc. its doubtful though, appearing weak having backed out of Exit, why would they agree to anything? so we just meekly accept the path ahead, complaining pointlessly at each stage, but everything will be easier that way? (and i do really mean that, i always assumed pragmatism from EU would see out stupid political posturing so a sensible, mutualy acceptable exit could be agreed, this clearly isnt case)
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/201...second-referendum-would-have-positive-impact/
#experts
#projectfear
#brexitmeansbrexit
he's probably right. its becoming clear that its too late, we're already too entrenched into the EU system to extract ourselves gracefully. prehaps we should instead sue for peace and try to come to some agreement that we dont have to continue on the interventionist path, that we remain outside the Euro, outside of centralised fiscal policy, foreign policy, army etc. its doubtful though, appearing weak having backed out of Exit, why would they agree to anything? so we just meekly accept the path ahead, complaining pointlessly at each stage, but everything will be easier that way? (and i do really mean that, i always assumed pragmatism from EU would see out stupid political posturing so a sensible, mutualy acceptable exit could be agreed, this clearly isnt case)
You were aware that Cameron had been given what you are asking for here? If we had voted remain instead of leave, it would be written into the treaties by now.
You mean we should ask for exactly what we currently have? Sounds good to me.
yes, it would do for many. the point is that on offer, remaining in the EU means conceding on those point in the next decade or so (as they have on their road map). what we currently have is and never was an option, we leave or we integrate further according to the EU plans.
yes, it would do for many. the point is that on offer, remaining in the EU means conceding on those point in the next decade or so (as they have on their road map). what we currently have is and never was an option, we leave or we integrate further according to the EU plans.
We have to go through with this for our grandchildren , the small, mislead majority for Brexit must have their way.With the Met Police announcing that they will not investigate huge numbers of "lower level" crimes, the NHS in crisis, social care in crisis, all public sector employees under a wage rise cap and this at a time with apparently next to no unemployment, how can we afford to go through with Brexit?