beorhthelm
A. Virgo, Football Genius
- Jul 21, 2003
- 36,019
Those are counting areas not constituencies. There are 650 constituencies.
so they are, they do look like they follow constituencies.
Those are counting areas not constituencies. There are 650 constituencies.
No only a third of people voted for Brxit, the old and the thick https://yougov.co.uk/news/2016/06/27/how-britain-voted/
Those are counting areas not constituencies. There are 650 constituencies.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
No only a third of people voted for Brxit, the old and the thick https://yougov.co.uk/news/2016/06/27/how-britain-voted/
It is important that this isn't seen as an ad hominem attack. It is a statistical fact that older and less educated people voted for Brexit. That isn't an insult.
It is important that this isn't seen as an ad hominem attack. It is a statistical fact that older and less educated people voted for Brexit. That isn't an insult.
What does that say about the couldn't-give-a-shit-and-be-bothered-to-vote young and better educated people?
No only a third of people voted for Brxit, the old and the thick https://yougov.co.uk/news/2016/06/27/how-britain-voted/
No only a third of people voted for Brxit, the old and the thick https://yougov.co.uk/news/2016/06/27/how-britain-voted/
I see 5% of UKIP voters voted remain. They must be the really thick who couldn't work out which box to tick.
I expect utter chaos if parliament fails to deliver on this promise...
If you don't vote, you are not included in the figure.No only a third of people voted for Brxit, the old and the thick https://yougov.co.uk/news/2016/06/27/how-britain-voted/
I do not think it's ironic at all in the light of a referendum that was held as part of government policy.Regardless - that is how the system works. The system that Brexiters wanted to give MORE power to. The irony of this situation is astounding.
I do not think it's ironic at all in the light of a referendum that was held as part of government policy.
Which is why a majority will vote to trigger article 50, assuming it even gets to a vote. Seems a rather vague judgment expect it will be overturned.
If I'm reading that link correctly 5% of UKippers voted remain [emoji38]ol:
Beaten to it. Yes, one in twenty UKIP supporters are too thick to vote for their own party's policies.
Equally I am sure you will agree that there should be parliamentary scrutiny of the terms negotiated, otherwise it could be just the likes of Fox or Davies determining their interpretation of a democratic vote.
i dont think so, at least not as the stronger Brexiteers have hoped. i foresee an almighty fudge from EU to bring us back into the fold.
It is vague and even if not overturned, the government could possibly just put an equally vague strategy for parliament to vote on rather than allow close scrutiny of the final details.Which is why a majority will vote to trigger article 50, assuming it even gets to a vote. Seems a rather vague judgment expect it will be overturned.
Yes, this is probably a sideshow. Unfortunately I believe it is a wholly unproductive action.I think so too. Pain in the arse as far as I'm concerned, there are far more important things to deal with at present, such as Russia taking the piss left, right and centre.
Equally I am sure you will agree that there should be parliamentary scrutiny of the terms negotiated, otherwise it could be just the likes of Fox or Davies determining their interpretation of a democratic vote.