Blawg . Your love it. It's funny....ish

[Gilliver's Travels]

This whole affair says far more about the state of the Argus (which once boasted a 250k audited circulation) than it does about any individual contributor.

In fact, I shall buy one this weekend just to see for myself, before heading off for the Woking game.


Footnote to fellow expats: witnessing the Exeter game convinced me the Albion's football really is as good as you've been hearing...

 

[Pot noodles for everyone]

On reflection, mine is, as ROSM says, too contrived.

That blog entry really is an embarrassment though.

 

[Mendoza]

And it shall have one soon.

surely that will kill the art of the highly intellectual conversation and debate that makes NSC so brilliant, meaning we could miss out on great words suck as SPACKHEAD, MONG and CLUNGEFEST

 

[Bozza]

surely that will kill the art of the highly intellectual conversation and debate that makes NSC so brilliant, meaning we could miss out on great words suck as SPACKHEAD, MONG and CLUNGEFEST

Nah - it will be a Facebook Like button so when you really LIKE something you make the click which will post to your Facebook feed.

Your real chums will see your like and be intrigued and come to NSC to catch up on the buffoonery. Whilst here they might click on a Google advert or two and earn us some money.

Either that or they'll just increase the cost of our hosting, earning us no more revenue meaning the losses NSC has started to incur begins to accelerate.

 

[8ace]

Nah - it will be a Facebook Like button so when you really LIKE something you make the click which will post to your Facebook feed.

Your real chums will see your like and be intrigued and come to NSC to catch up on the buffoonery. Whilst here they might click on a Google advert or two and earn us some money.

Either that or they'll just increase the cost of our hosting, earning us no more revenue meaning the losses NSC has started to incur begins to accelerate.

Can we have the tags back as well?

 

[Bozza]

Can we have the tags back as well?

What tags?

 

[The Antikythera Mechanism]

Nah - it will be a Facebook Like button so when you really LIKE something you make the click which will post to your Facebook feed.

Your real chums will see your like and be intrigued and come to NSC to catch up on the buffoonery. Whilst here they might click on a Google advert or two and earn us some money.

Either that or they'll just increase the cost of our hosting, earning us no more revenue meaning the losses NSC has started to incur begins to accelerate.

I will be doing a large chunk of my Christmas shopping using the Amazon link

 

[8ace]

What tags?

We had them on for a bit, I think they are used to form the tag cloud.

 

[steward 433]

Your real chums will see your like and be intrigued and come to NSC to catch up on the buffoonery. Whilst here they might click on a Google advert or two and earn us some money.

Do we get revenue just from clicking? Or only clicking and buying?

 

[Garage_Doors]

To paraphrase a footballing comment.

He’s got to be disappointed with that effort.

 

[Bozza]

I will be doing a large chunk of my Christmas shopping using the Amazon link

I literally love you.

We had them on for a bit, I think they are used to form the tag cloud.

Oh those. They all turned a bit bad didn't they? But it was kinda fun. I might put them on for some bonus Friday fun.

Do we get revenue just from clicking? Or only clicking and buying?

Google ads pay for clicking alone, but please only click adverts that you are interested in. Google monitor usage and if there are what appears to be artificial clicking peaks, they can ban us from their programme and that can be disastrous for us as the revenue earned from Google is the lifeblood of NSC.

 

[Digweeds Trousers]

Sorry Tim - I've just read that.

It's dreadful - i mean utterly appalling.

My brother-in-law used to work for The Independent - and he always used to say that the worst crime a journalist or writer could commit was assume that people were interested in the content.

Reading your self-indulgent, feeble, turd of a piece of literature clearly shows you commiting such a crime.

That you are so disconnected from reality that you then decide to post it again and again and again is for me, the crowning puddle of puke on this vomit-ridden sludge of an article.

Every time (and I am to blame for this) i read your articles, I am reminded of a moment in history when the first illiterate, backward caveman first tried to 'write'.

At least they had an indisputable reason as to why their efforts were poor, non-sensical baby-scrawl.

You do not.

May I suggest that next time you decide to 'entertain' the masses instead of taking the lid off your pen, you simply drop your pants, squat over the paper and take a big shit.

I promise you - it will be far more remarkable than this latest dribbling. It is the literary equivalent of a large, wet skid-mark in some old crusty pants.

Please.

Stop.

 

[steward 433]

Google ads pay for clicking alone, but please only click adverts that you are interested in. Google monitor usage and if there are what appears to be artificial clicking peaks, they can ban us from their programme and that can be disastrous for us as the revenue earned from Google is the lifeblood of NSC.

No worries will bear it in mind and also will be buying through amazon for xmas.

 

[hitony]

Sorry Tim - I've just read that.

It's dreadful - i mean utterly appalling.

My brother-in-law used to work for The Independent - and he always used to say that the worst crime a journalist or writer could commit was assume that people were interested in the content.

Reading your self-indulgent, feeble, turd of a piece of literature clearly shows you commiting such a crime.

That you are so disconnected from reality that you then decide to post it again and again and again is for me, the crowning puddle of puke on this vomit-ridden sludge of an article.

Every time (and I am to blame for this) i read your articles, I am reminded of a moment in history when the first illiterate, backward caveman first tried to 'write'.

At least they had an indisputable reason as to why their efforts were poor, non-sensical baby-scrawl.

You do not.

May I suggest that next time you decide to 'entertain' the masses instead of taking the lid off your pen, you simply drop your pants, squat over the paper and take a big shit.

I promise you - it will be far more remarkable than this latest dribbling. It is the literary equivalent of a large, wet skid-mark in some old crusty pants.

Please.

Stop.

Sorry Bozza & Simster and all other contributors....but the above is now winning .... do keep them coming, this is turning into a good thread now........

 

[Stumpy Tim]

Sorry Bozza & Simster....but the above is now winning ....

A literary masterpiece it is for sure. Something the Argus SHOULD be printing

 

[ROSM]

Sorry Tim - I've just read that.

It's dreadful - i mean utterly appalling.

My brother-in-law used to work for The Independent - and he always used to say that the worst crime a journalist or writer could commit was assume that people were interested in the content.

Reading your self-indulgent, feeble, turd of a piece of literature clearly shows you commiting such a crime.

That you are so disconnected from reality that you then decide to post it again and again and again is for me, the crowning puddle of puke on this vomit-ridden sludge of an article.

Every time (and I am to blame for this) i read your articles, I am reminded of a moment in history when the first illiterate, backward caveman first tried to 'write'.

At least they had an indisputable reason as to why their efforts were poor, non-sensical baby-scrawl.

You do not.

May I suggest that next time you decide to 'entertain' the masses instead of taking the lid off your pen, you simply drop your pants, squat over the paper and take a big shit.

I promise you - it will be far more remarkable than this latest dribbling. It is the literary equivalent of a large, wet skid-mark in some old crusty pants.

Please.

Stop.

I feel you could have constructed it a bit better - used the pyramid structure to reveal more detail behind your thoughts. However you have worked hard to get my attention, counstructed your case and have written with passion and entertained me.

8/10

 

[Gwylan]

HB&B has a fan...

Tim didn't link to his blog this week but it's on the Argus anyway.

We're top of the league and we're having a laugh. From The Argus)

.... and attracting comments.

"Why do you let this man child post such utter dirge on the website. He is obviously drunk, has special needs, or both."

Bit harsh, IMO, I thought it was one of Tim's better efforts.

 

[ROSM]

Ffffff (sorry his blog thread is already gaining momentum elsewhere)

 

[Icy Gull]

Tim didn't link to his blog this week but it's on the Argus anyway.

.... and attracting comments.

"Why do you let this man child post such utter dirge on the website. He is obviously drunk, has special needs, or both."

Bit harsh, IMO, I thought it was one of Tim's better efforts.

Shit use of English too, shouldn't it be bilge rather than dirge?

 

[sten_super]

You really think Timmy would have missed an opportunity to big himself up?