- Jul 10, 2003
- 27,776
Good point. Except when the top is closed, at which point visibility is abysmal.
And what about cyclists that have wraparound sunglasses with solid arms at the sides ? This is getting more complicated than i thought.
Good point. Except when the top is closed, at which point visibility is abysmal.
you really need to look at the cost/benefit analysis poppet, you are simply not getting it
Typical bas***d cyclist ruining everyone's dayThe Bicycling Vigilante
London cyclist Dave Sherry has busted hundreds of law-breaking motorists.
http://www.bicycling.com/blogs/thehub/bicycling-vigilante?cid=socBL_20141011_33286717
Hear hear! These cyclists should pay their own separate road tax.The roads were built for cars and other motorised vehicles who have paid for them through a tax disc , if the cyclist want to make the roads more cyclist friendly then why should the motor vehicles pay for it ? if the cyclist are willing to contribute then I am all for it . I am a car driver and cyclist by the way .
British motorists are generally very competent and law abiding - unfortunately the same can't be said for cyclists, who, every day you will see running red lights, swaying all over the road while talking on the mobile phone, cycling through pedestrian crossings etc.
It's obvious why cyclists are far less likely to be model users of the road - because they have got no license and are almost never prosecuted. Whilst "driving is a privilege, not a right" cycling seems to be a right, they can more or less do as they please, and they do just that.
This idea could probably never be implemented, but it's a good talking point. Cyclists need to improve their behaviour on the road.
The roads were built for cars and other motorised vehicles who have paid for them through a tax disc
The roads were built for cars and other motorised vehicles who have paid for them through a tax disc , if the cyclist want to make the roads more cyclist friendly then why should the motor vehicles pay for it ? if the cyclist are willing to contribute then I am all for it . I am a car driver and cyclist by the way .
No they weren't.The roads were built for cars and other motorised vehicles
No they haven't.who have paid for them through a tax disc
They already do, as does everyone else.if the cyclist are willing to contribute then I am all for it.
The roads were built for cars and other motorised vehicles who have paid for them through a tax disc , if the cyclist want to make the roads more cyclist friendly then why should the motor vehicles pay for it ? if the cyclist are willing to contribute then I am all for it . I am a car driver and cyclist by the way .
Ha, its exactly this type type of thought process that typifies the anti-cycling rhetoric that gets bandied around, i.e. ill thought out ignorant guff with no hint of intelligence when coming to a conclusion regarding people who ride bikes.
doh ! I am a cyclist did you not read ?? I honestly thought the roads were paid for through tax disc payment , silly me ! and that is from a tax disc payer . I have not seen much intelligence from about 50% of cyclists either .
It would be so simple to set up a tax of around £100 annually for anyone who wants to ride on the roads
I don't think it is about license plates, it's about the cyclist not the bike. As has been mentioned, hi vis vests with a license number on front and back would suffice.
Yes and look like a right knob. Licence plate on the underneath the saddle should suffice.
Yes and look like a right knob. Licence plate on the underneath the saddle should suffice.