vegster
Sanity Clause
- May 5, 2008
- 28,273
I should get out there and build us some fit for purpose cycle tracks then, nibble old chum.
There are hundreds of miles of cycle lanes available to cyclists, to others they are known as pavements.
I should get out there and build us some fit for purpose cycle tracks then, nibble old chum.
A bicycle hitting a person will do far less damage then a vehicle hitting a cyclist, the law needs to be USE PAVEMENTS NOT ROADSThere are hundreds of miles of cycle lanes available to cyclists, to others they are known as pavements.
A bicycle hitting a person will do far less damage then a vehicle hitting a cyclist, the law needs to be USE PAVEMENTS NOT ROADS
In a nutshell we have a person perched on a saddle and two wheels with zero protection on a road with Trucks, vans, motorbikes, cars, emergency vehicles. There are gong to be problems.
Haha that last clip is priceless! Serves him right lolEspecially when the trucks are moving to slow for the cyclist as in these clips
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iO7_Fq56g2c
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lnYp4srEooI
Or the other way round as in this clip
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TlKlduaWRiY
Some cyclists are idiots, but at the the end of the day they are a bit of a nuisance. Badly driven motor vehicles KILL people and quite a few a year as we all know. The problem here is there is no sense of perspective, how some car drivers can take the moral high ground is beyond me.
For what it's worth, I think cyclists are mad to cycle down some roads. I run along Euston Rd and see the cyclists coming the other way with a lorry or a bus right behind them..the infrastructure needs to be put in place first
Haha that last clip is priceless! Serves him right lol
[emoji468] [emoji590] [emoji30]
Good evening YodaGod you're boring me.
Firstly, we do not know what the bus driver has done to cause the cyclist to act in this way.
Secondly, what the bus driver has done is an act of road rage, and both he and the company would end up liable.
Good evening Yoda
I'm so glad I bore you
You're probably the sort of cyclist that gets a hard on getting in drivers way!
You->[emoji468] [emoji609] [emoji590] [emoji598] [emoji597] [emoji603] [emoji594] <-Me
Should've been using the cycle paths I bought for you.
Err! No Actually. I tend to avoid main roads now due to having two near misses due to inconsiderate DRIVING, and take the back roads.
1st one was where I was slowing to move around a car parked on my side of the road. Giving way to on coming traffic (Like the highway code says) only to get nearly taken out as I move out thinking the way was clear to find a car TAILGATING a van. (Ok this was before tailgating was made illegal, but still).
2nd time was on a T junction that was turned into a mini roundabout (one of the ones on Richmond Road in Worthing). The turn off was on my side of the road so I would have to give way to anyone wanting to turn down that road. On coming truck decides to turn down said road WITHOUT indicating and letting me know what manoeuvre he is making. The trouble was, I was already crossing the give way markings at the time and nearly ended up under one of his huge tyres.
I suppose in your mind, me being on the bike, BOTH instances were my fault.
Should've been using the cycle paths I bought for you.
Fully agree.
BUT. The thread is not about that it is about cyclists being registered so that they can be brought to book if they break the law/are caught breaking the law. We all know that cars are more dangerous and that many motorists break the law but they are registered and often brought to book. That isn't the subject we are dealing with here.
The comments from some cyclists to the question posed is not answered by "motorists are worse".
In London, Boris Bikes are clearly identifiable (each has a unique number and your details are held on the TFL database) and payment even comes with insurance. Are Boris Bike cyclists any more law abiding than cyclists on non identifiable bikes? If the answer is no, then how would a number plate on a bike make any difference whatsoever?
Personally, I wouldn't. But when doi you judge it's safe. if you were wrong, you wouldn't have a leg to stand on.
You're milking it now roger[emoji31]Same as you in your pedestrian guise, look right, look left, look right again, if it's safe to do so, cross. As I stand (ahem) I'm a 100% er
You're milking it now roger[emoji31]