BHA January transfer watch

[Blue Valkyrie]

So something by midday today then?

A news update.

No doubt telling us how hard transfer business is to do.

 

[S'hampton Seagull]

A news update.

No doubt telling us how hard transfer business is to do.

He'd be right about that at least.

 

[Randsta]

Come on give me hope!!!!!

 

[One Teddy Maybank]

How many times have we signed a player at the end of a window and been saying if only we had signed him earlier in the window. I realise that it is not alwwys possible but have the club not learnt from previous experiences.

Where I am as well.

 

[fleet]

A transfer news update doesn't sound much of a mood elevator after the events of last night. I suspect it was that we tried for JC and MB and it didn't happen, but we will work very hard and it is always difficult and ..... Not what I need to bring cheer after last nights game.

 

[Bozza]

A transfer news update doesn't sound much of a mood elevator after the events of last night. I suspect it was that we tried for JC and MB and it didn't happen, but we will work very hard and it is always difficult and ..... Not what I need to bring cheer after last nights game.

The club will never come out and name specific players, say they went after them but a deal couldn't be put together.

I've no idea what [MENTION=3743]seagullwedgee[/MENTION] is angling after. It reads to me as something vague and wishy washy that he could pin any whisper from anywhere onto. And if nothing happens, or nothing is said, he'll use his "potential" word as a back out clause.

 

[S'hampton Seagull]

The club will never come out and name specific players, say they went after them but a deal couldn't be put together.

I've no idea what [MENTION=3743]seagullwedgee[/MENTION] is angling after. It reads to me as something vague and wishy washy that he could pin any whisper from anywhere onto. And if nothing happens, or nothing is said, he'll use his "potential" word as a back out clause.

He was quite specific with the timescale onm this latest one though. Between 5pm yesterday and midday today, so only 3 hours left!

 

[Bozza]

He was quite specific with the timescale onm this latest one though. Between 5pm yesterday and midday today, so only 3 hours left!

"potential", never guaranteed etc etc

 

[S'hampton Seagull]

"potential", never guaranteed etc etc

True. He shouldn't bother posting info anymore if this one doesn't come off (which I don't think it will). For once I think Naylor has more info on this.

 

[Blue Valkyrie]

True. He shouldn't bother posting info anymore if this one doesn't come off (which I don't think it will). For once I think Naylor has more info on this.

Far rather wedgee posted than any of the palace goons did.

 

[Dorset Seagull]

I heard nothing in the immediate pipeline but things change quickly

 

[Blues Rock DJ]

welcome Mr Mourinho..........

 

[maltaseagull]

welcome Mr Mourinho..........

That was quick - replacing Nathan?

 

[seagullwedgee]

Bozza, I really think you're confusing me with some attention seeking keyboard warrior who craves attention and glorifies himself if he occasionally gets something right. Can I suggest you check the nature of my posting history, as I've never done that, never will.

As I posted before, I'm fortunate to have three independent (as in, they don't know each other, and have no links) sources, with access to potentially useful and genuine insight. And only when I get it corroborated by two or more of them (to remove an element of misinterpretation or punting) do I post.

But, I get the impression that such information is not wanted so I will duck out now.

Yesterday's update was to confirm from reliable sources (and this might not seem like rocket science) that we are still in for both SAs (which I actually found quite remarkable, after recent history) and that although we wanted to strike early, the complexity got in the way, but we are still prepared to play the longer game, because the belief is that the asset value at such a young age would make it a positive investment, even if the current year impact is reduced by the delays. That was it, not rocket science, but corroborated insight as opposed to p1ssing in the wind.

Anything I get from now will just be shared with the 3 closed whatsapp groups I belong to. Apologies if anyone on here thinks I have cost them too much time with my input, that was of course never my intention, but I understand why people might get agitated, because most do not know me, and certainly don't know my sources, and so might think the same as you do Bozza, that I'm a warped keyboard warrior with nothing better to do than post crap and create waves.

No hard feelings.

.

 

[dwayne]

Bozza, I really think you're confusing me with some attention seeking keyboard warrior who craves attention and glorifies himself if he occasionally gets something right. Can I suggest you check the nature of my posting history, as I've never done that, never will.

As I posted before, I'm fortunate to have three independent (as in, they don't know each other, and have no links) sources, with access to potentially useful and genuine insight. And only when I get it corroborated by two or more of them (to remove an element of misinterpretation or punting) do I post.

But, I get the impression that such information is not wanted so I will duck out now.

Yesterday's update was to confirm from reliable sources (and this might not seem like rocket science) that we are still in for both SAs (which I actually found quite remarkable, after recent history) and that although we wanted to strike early, the complexity got in the way, but we are still prepared to play the longer game, because the belief is that the asset value at such a young age would make it a positive investment, even if the current year impact is reduced by the delays. That was it, not rocket science, but corroborated insight as opposed to p1ssing in the wind.

Anything I get from now will just be shared with the 3 closed whatsapp groups I belong to. Apologies if anyone on here thinks I have cost them too much time with my input, that was of course never my intention, but I understand why people might get agitated, because most do not know me, and certainly don't know my sources, and so might think the same as you do Bozza, that I'm a warped keyboard warrior with nothing better to do than post crap and create waves.

No hard feelings.

.

Man up you wuss!!

I look out for your updates even if they are wrong sometimes. Keep us in the loop.

 

[seagullwedgee]

! Thanks!

 

[Urchin]

Bozza, I really think you're confusing me with some attention seeking keyboard warrior who craves attention and glorifies himself if he occasionally gets something right. Can I suggest you check the nature of my posting history, as I've never done that, never will.

As I posted before, I'm fortunate to have three independent (as in, they don't know each other, and have no links) sources, with access to potentially useful and genuine insight. And only when I get it corroborated by two or more of them (to remove an element of misinterpretation or punting) do I post.

But, I get the impression that such information is not wanted so I will duck out now.

Yesterday's update was to confirm from reliable sources (and this might not seem like rocket science) that we are still in for both SAs (which I actually found quite remarkable, after recent history) and that although we wanted to strike early, the complexity got in the way, but we are still prepared to play the longer game, because the belief is that the asset value at such a young age would make it a positive investment, even if the current year impact is reduced by the delays. That was it, not rocket science, but corroborated insight as opposed to p1ssing in the wind.

Anything I get from now will just be shared with the 3 closed whatsapp groups I belong to. Apologies if anyone on here thinks I have cost them too much time with my input, that was of course never my intention, but I understand why people might get agitated, because most do not know me, and certainly don't know my sources, and so might think the same as you do Bozza, that I'm a warped keyboard warrior with nothing better to do than post crap and create waves.

No hard feelings.

.

I wouldn't mind a PM from time to time!

 

[sdmartin1]

Bozza, I really think you're confusing me with some attention seeking keyboard warrior who craves attention and glorifies himself if he occasionally gets something right. Can I suggest you check the nature of my posting history, as I've never done that, never will.

As I posted before, I'm fortunate to have three independent (as in, they don't know each other, and have no links) sources, with access to potentially useful and genuine insight. And only when I get it corroborated by two or more of them (to remove an element of misinterpretation or punting) do I post.

But, I get the impression that such information is not wanted so I will duck out now.

Yesterday's update was to confirm from reliable sources (and this might not seem like rocket science) that we are still in for both SAs (which I actually found quite remarkable, after recent history) and that although we wanted to strike early, the complexity got in the way, but we are still prepared to play the longer game, because the belief is that the asset value at such a young age would make it a positive investment, even if the current year impact is reduced by the delays. That was it, not rocket science, but corroborated insight as opposed to p1ssing in the wind.

Anything I get from now will just be shared with the 3 closed whatsapp groups I belong to. Apologies if anyone on here thinks I have cost them too much time with my input, that was of course never my intention, but I understand why people might get agitated, because most do not know me, and certainly don't know my sources, and so might think the same as you do Bozza, that I'm a warped keyboard warrior with nothing better to do than post crap and create waves.

No hard feelings.

.

It seems almost nobody has a very good idea of what is going on anymore as the club keeps it's cards very close to it's chest. Do keep posting though, always find them interesting even if they don't come to fruition.

 

[dadams2k11]

I wouldn't mind a PM from time to time!

This

 

[glasfryn]

Bozza, I really think you're confusing me with some attention seeking keyboard warrior who craves attention and glorifies himself if he occasionally gets something right. Can I suggest you check the nature of my posting history, as I've never done that, never will.

As I posted before, I'm fortunate to have three independent (as in, they don't know each other, and have no links) sources, with access to potentially useful and genuine insight. And only when I get it corroborated by two or more of them (to remove an element of misinterpretation or punting) do I post.

But, I get the impression that such information is not wanted so I will duck out now.

Yesterday's update was to confirm from reliable sources (and this might not seem like rocket science) that we are still in for both SAs (which I actually found quite remarkable, after recent history) and that although we wanted to strike early, the complexity got in the way, but we are still prepared to play the longer game, because the belief is that the asset value at such a young age would make it a positive investment, even if the current year impact is reduced by the delays. That was it, not rocket science, but corroborated insight as opposed to p1ssing in the wind.

Anything I get from now will just be shared with the 3 closed whatsapp groups I belong to. Apologies if anyone on here thinks I have cost them too much time with my input, that was of course never my intention, but I understand why people might get agitated, because most do not know me, and certainly don't know my sources, and so might think the same as you do Bozza, that I'm a warped keyboard warrior with nothing better to do than post crap and create waves.

No hard feelings.

.

all sounds very reasonable to me .................keep posting