Ban Fox Hunting Forever

[Dr Schnell]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Ban Fox Hunting Forever

you don't even deserve an answer

What a great answer. Congratulations

 

[lost in london]

I too would like the evil of foxhunting explained. It's a fox. If it was a human, fair enough, but it's an animal. Almost all animals are hunted, whether by humans or by other animals.

And this whole issue is a class issue. People love the idea of being able to get one over the 'toffs'.

 

[caz99]

what sad people you really are.

no one is saying they are more important than humans are they? idiots.

its not class its a blood sport that has no benefit whatsoever to anyone but the people who like riding horses and taking dogs to rip apart animals.

toffs or not its cruel barbaric and needs to be stopped.

 

[DTES]

Almost all animals are hunted, whether by humans or by other animals.

For food. No-one's trying to ban the killing of animals for that. This is, apparently, "sport".

 

[bhaexpress]

But does the issue warrant the hysterior (sp) that surrounds it?

Its a class issue and people who argue otherwise aren't, I guess, being honest. People who bang on about the rights of a fox should get their priorities in order (NHS, Education, Pensions, Immigration, Crime, Yob Culture are important issues to me, but FOXES!!!! No ) [/QUOTE

Bearing mind you f*** pigs anyway you vew is biased.

Seriously though, I shave spent the last couple of days outside the Brighton Centre and apart from distributing pro Falmer propoganda I've also been playing spot the (non NSC) loonies.

Would you like it if your home town was invaded by a reviled section of our democratic society be it Watford or Leyton who wanted to make their poiint by abusing aninals ?

 

[bhaexpress]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Ban Fox Hunting Forever

you don't even deserve an answer

Seconded.

 

[looney]

Anti-hunting scum should be sent to the gas chambers, or dragged into a field and have their throats cut. Its the only language these morons understand.

 

[alan partridge]

Anti-hunting scum should be sent to the gas chambers, or dragged into a field and have their throats cut. Its the only language these morons understand.

From the Internet School For Young Trolls

D- : A very poor attempt by young Looney to jump on another posters initial controversial statement. The student (Looney) as already had time to see the reaction the previous posting has had and is indulging in a bit of 'sloppy trolling seconds'.

Must try harder.

 

[Dr Schnell]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Ban Fox Hunting Forever

Seconded.

Actually BHA Express you appear to have jumped to one or two conclusions. I don't have any views either way on hunting but I am eager to understand better the issues on both sides of the fence. I merely asked for someone to explain the "EVIL of fox hunting" as it was referred to by someone else. All I have received in response from cretinous individuals like yourself is abuse. Do you have anything interesting to say on this or are you going to revert once again to being a moron?

 

[caz99]

i have posted an answer.

 

[Artois]

I too would like the evil of foxhunting explained. It's a fox. If it was a human, fair enough, but it's an animal. Almost all animals are hunted, whether by humans or by other animals.

And this whole issue is a class issue. People love the idea of being able to get one over the 'toffs'.

I just don't understand what goes on in the brains of people like you.

 

[looney]

Ban hunting of foxes like Hitler did , hunting people is much more fun.We should be allowed to hunt Jews, to stop them conspiring. And blacks, they'll make for a competative chase.


Tally Ho!!!

 

[alan partridge]

Ban hunting of foxes like Hitler did , hunting people is much more fun.We should be allowed to hunt Jews, to stop them conspiring. And blacks, they'll make for a competative chase.


Tally Ho!!!

tsk

sloppy work

E+

 

[Dr Schnell]

Thank you Caz 99. Someone with intelligence at last. Can I ask another question. Where do we draw the line as far as killing animals is concerned? Do you take it to its logical conclusion and ban the killing of animals for food? This piece of new legislation will effectively protect the wellbeing of various animals and implies that they have rights (i.e. a right not to be hunted down and killed). It seems pretty clear to me that if an animal has this right you don't have very far to go to argue that the eating of animals is also a cruel and barbaric act and one that should be outlawed. You can no longer justify it by saying it is a necessity as humans can easily survive without meat. Perhaps I am going a little far with this but I certainly believe that if you ban fox hunting then there is absolutely no justification for any other sport that kills animals, for example let's ban fishing...

 

[looney]

Pst Dr Schell, ask em about Halal/Kosher and watch them twist themselves into logical loops.

 

[Easy 10]

It really shouldn't need explaining, Dr Schnell.

A fox is chased across the countryside by a pack of hounds. It is pursued until it is exhausted. The hounds eventually descend on the exhausted fox and inflict the most terrifying, agonising death imaginable on any living creature, by surrounding it and tearing it to pieces while it is still alive. The fox is completely shredded by dozens of snapping, snarling jaws. And this isn't done for food. It isn't done out of necessity. It is done for fun.

Now if you actually need someone to sit down with you and carefully explain to you why that activity is evil, then you sadly seem to have the same mental defect which seems to be present in the people who are dumping dead animals all over Brighton today.

 

[caz99]

Thank you Caz 99. Someone with intelligence at last. Can I ask another question. Where do we draw the line as far as killing animals is concerned? Do you take it to its logical conclusion and ban the killing of animals for food? This piece of new legislation will effectively protect the wellbeing of various animals and implies that they have rights (i.e. a right not to be hunted down and killed). It seems pretty clear to me that if an animal has this right you don't have very far to go to argue that the eating of animals is also a cruel and barbaric act and one that should be outlawed. You can no longer justify it by saying it is a necessity as humans can easily survive without meat. Perhaps I am going a little far with this but I certainly believe that if you ban fox hunting then there is absolutely no justification for any other sport that kills animals, for example let's ban fishing...

i would agree to a certain extent with you yes. and i am a hyprocrite in that i do eat chicken, which is the worst as they are bread in appalling conditions. not red meat mind, however you are talking about fox hunting which is a sport. usually animals are bred for meat, not any better however we don't chase cows and chickens across the countryside and then rip them to shreds and then not eat them. beagles are also bred especially for foxhunting and when they are no longer any good disposed of.i don't necessarily agree that we don't need meat to survive as i think man has been eating meat for centuries however it was probably more out of necessity then than it is now.

i agree i don't like shooting for example pheasants, hare coarsing, badger baiting although now supposedly illegal, bullfighting which is also now banned in a lot of areas of spain. i do not therefore agree with any sort of 'sport' involving animals. the same as any cruelty to humans would repel me.

so yes i am hypocritical from the point that i eat some meat and i am honest and hold my hands up to that. however i do not know how you can justify fox hunting.

 

[Tom Bombadil]

Did you see the kosher slaughterers on Tv last night, very interesting.

 

[Brovion]

.... for example let's ban fishing...

Absolutely. That's what I said on page 1 - and I was being serious. If we're going to get all self-righteous about torturing animals for fun then it is the next logical step. You could argue that we do eat some of the fish and that others, after being tortured, are put back. So what? Surely it's the enjoyment of torturing animals we're protesting about?

It's not today's debate but the 'killing animals for food is ok' arguement will also be challenged soon. After all the fox doesn't know if it's being killed for food or fun. Is it better to be a 'free range' fox who until the last few hours lives all it's life as nature intended or a battery chicken or caged pig?

PS - I have no axe to grind, I don't give stuff about hunting one way or the other. Can we discuss something important now like Transport or the NHS?

 

[Dr Schnell]

I just don't understand what goes on in the brains of people like you.

Perhaps if there was a little more going on in your brain you might understand that other people, like Lost in London, have different opinions to yourself