Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Politics] Are Labour going to turn this country around?

Is Labour going to turn the country around

  • Yes

    Votes: 126 25.9%
  • No

    Votes: 296 60.9%
  • Fence

    Votes: 64 13.2%

  • Total voters
    486


beorhthelm

A. Virgo, Football Genius
Jul 21, 2003
36,146
Let me explain again. For example, let’s suppose there are currently 100 million seats on flights per year and we want to reduce flight emissions by 50%. That means we have to enforce an upper limit of 50 million seats on flights per year. We give everyone the UK an allowance of 1 flight. Now, not everyone wants to fly, so if you want to have an extra flight you can buy someone else’s allowance from them. You get your extra flight, someone who doesn’t fly gets some money, and emissions are cut by 50%.

While we’re at it, I’d also introduce a fat tax for heavier passengers.
again? didn't see any detail suggested before. either way if the intention is such a cut in total flights, just impose a 50 million seat-flight limit. no real need to add any trading, who does that benefit other than well off frequent flyers?
 




dsr-burnley

Well-known member
Aug 15, 2014
2,762
again? didn't see any detail suggested before. either way if the intention is such a cut in total flights, just impose a 50 million seat-flight limit. no real need to add any trading, who does that benefit other than well off frequent flyers?
It was about the 1960's that package holidays abroad came down to the price where the working classes could afford them. I suspect your policy would take us back to the fifties and make foreign holidays once more the preserve of the rich, and only the rich.

Herr Tubthumper's idea (which I don't agree with either, but that's by the by) at least gives the less well-off the chance of either a foreign holiday or a cash boost. Your idea gives them neither.

I wonder if it would be practicable to prevent people sailing to France and flying from there? Or would this be a worldwide policy (not USA under Trump, obvliously)?
 


BadFish

Huge Member
Oct 19, 2003
18,858
What are you going on about, Gordon Brown was PM from 2007 to 2010. The 2008 car crash was nothing to do with Cameron or Brexit.

I doubt nations around the world took much attention to the financial guidance provided by man who said he had abolished boom and bust in the U.K. and knighted Fred Goodwin for his services to banking.

It’s like asking Peter Sutcliffe for advice on the best tools for DIY.
I am saying that the reason the crash caused more problems for the UK than anywhere is was because of the austerity policies introduced on the back of it. Nowhere did i suggest that the crash was anything to do with the Cameron. However the reaction to the crash is what caused the problems for the UK, introduced by Cameron and including Brexit.

I read somewhere recently that someone in the Brown's labour government was invised to advise a number of other countries on their stimulus plan to kick start economies after the crash. Much like we did over here in Australia. If I remember rightly it was Peter Mandleson or Alistair Darling - anyway I can't find reference to that part so perhaps I shall retract the part about him advising other countries. Although Darling's handling of the crisis has generally been lauded.
 


beorhthelm

A. Virgo, Football Genius
Jul 21, 2003
36,146
I am saying that the reason the crash caused more problems for the UK than anywhere is was because of the austerity policies introduced on the back of it. Nowhere did i suggest that the crash was anything to do with the Cameron. However the reaction to the crash is what caused the problems for the UK, introduced by Cameron and including Brexit.

I read somewhere recently that someone in the Brown's labour government was invised to advise a number of other countries on their stimulus plan to kick start economies after the crash. Much like we did over here in Australia. If I remember rightly it was Peter Mandleson or Alistair Darling - anyway I can't find reference to that part so perhaps I shall retract the part about him advising other countries. Although Darling's handling of the crisis has generally been lauded.
it didn't! remember Greece? nearly same occured in Italy and Spain, where GDP is still below 2008, France and Germany GDP growth average is half before then. Europe has still not really recoverd, productivity and GDP have flat lined, while inflation and demand on services went up. we're few percent different here and there.
 


Thunder Bolt

Silly old bat
I am saying that the reason the crash caused more problems for the UK than anywhere is was because of the austerity policies introduced on the back of it. Nowhere did i suggest that the crash was anything to do with the Cameron. However the reaction to the crash is what caused the problems for the UK, introduced by Cameron and including Brexit.

I read somewhere recently that someone in the Brown's labour government was invised to advise a number of other countries on their stimulus plan to kick start economies after the crash. Much like we did over here in Australia. If I remember rightly it was Peter Mandleson or Alistair Darling - anyway I can't find reference to that part so perhaps I shall retract the part about him advising other countries. Although Darling's handling of the crisis has generally been lauded.
Barak Obama praised Gordon Brown for his integrity and advice.

 




BadFish

Huge Member
Oct 19, 2003
18,858
it didn't! remember Greece? nearly same occured in Italy and Spain, where GDP is still below 2008, France and Germany GDP growth average is half before then. Europe has still not really recoverd, productivity and GDP have flat lined, while inflation and demand on services went up. we're few percent different here and there.

Okay, well according to @cunning fergus it did.
 


Herr Tubthumper

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 11, 2003
63,612
The Fatherland
That all sounds nice, but doesn't it assume 100% occupancy on all flights can be achieved, and those flights are all going to the right destinations?
Just nice destinations.
 


Machiavelli

Well-known member
Oct 11, 2013
18,106
Fiveways
I am saying that the reason the crash caused more problems for the UK than anywhere is was because of the austerity policies introduced on the back of it. Nowhere did i suggest that the crash was anything to do with the Cameron. However the reaction to the crash is what caused the problems for the UK, introduced by Cameron and including Brexit.

I read somewhere recently that someone in the Brown's labour government was invised to advise a number of other countries on their stimulus plan to kick start economies after the crash. Much like we did over here in Australia. If I remember rightly it was Peter Mandleson or Alistair Darling - anyway I can't find reference to that part so perhaps I shall retract the part about him advising other countries. Although Darling's handling of the crisis has generally been lauded.
The UK were more affected by 2008 for the reason that its financial sector had become such a large % of the economy, a far higher proportion that most if not all other countries. Austerity didn't help either, although the deficits did need to come down as they were really high post-2008. Brown has been roundly lauded for the response to 2008.
 




The Clamp

Well-known member
Jan 11, 2016
26,621
West is BEST
Let me explain again. For example, let’s suppose there are currently 100 million seats on flights per year and we want to reduce flight emissions by 50%. That means we have to enforce an upper limit of 50 million seats on flights per year. We give everyone the UK an allowance of 1 flight. Now, not everyone wants to fly, so if you want to have an extra flight you can buy someone else’s allowance from them. You get your extra flight, someone who doesn’t fly gets some money, and emissions are cut by 50%.

While we’re at it, I’d also introduce a fat tax for heavier passengers.
Probably best to allow everyone two flights.
 




Moshe Gariani

Well-known member
Mar 10, 2005
12,271
Chancellor Rachel Reeves is in Oxfordshire to deliver a speech on the government's plans to boost economic growth.
 








Bry Nylon

Test your smoke alarm
Helpful Moderator
Jul 21, 2003
20,775
Playing snooker
Chancellor Rachel Reeves is in Oxfordshire to deliver a speech on the government's plans to boost economic growth.
Well, thank goodness for that. It's about time someone in government shone a light on the left-behind communities of Chipping Norton and Henley-on-Thames.
 










rippleman

Well-known member
Oct 18, 2011
5,072
So her solution to the climate crisis is to built a new airport runway? Am I understanding this right? Or have she and Starmer leapt on board the climate denier bus?
 




Nibbler

710 77345
Aug 12, 2014
248
Westdene
So her solution to the climate crisis is to built a new airport runway? Am I understanding this right? Or have she and Starmer leapt on board the climate denier bus?
I was initially baffled.

But then I realised that once it is built (and provided ten years worth of jobs for the construction workers) we can decide not to actually use it. A bit like HS2.
 




Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here