Beach Hut
Brighton Bhuna Boy
Very much this.
Groovy Gang revving up for a cockfest with each other
Very much this.
Do they pay less in the 1901 wings compared to the centre?
I wonder how much more it will be if we go up, bearing in mind there is 4 less games.
Not read the whole thread, and my maths is none too good, but I thought rises were between 2 & 5% yet the OP gives % rises from 6 to nearly 10%, or am I reading it wrong?
Added in travel sup.
This is wants annoying me and not many seem to be picking up on this point , if we were in the prem it's 4 less games so in fact the current price rise would already be greater if we get promoted because of the 4 fewer games
Of course, the real issue at the heart of this is footballers and their agents demanding £7'000 / £8'000+ a week to play second tier football, whilst the rest of us - who would be happy to earn in year what they take out the club in a month - are left to argue with each other over whether an extra £50 a year is fair or not.
Of course, this isn't an issue unique to the Albion, but is the reason why I hardly go to football anymore.
then double the prices............... LETS KEEP IT REALSimply, if £20 - £30 is the going rate to push the Albion into the Premier League: bring it on!
common sense prevails at lastabsolutely spot on. Couldn't agree more. We have to stump up an extra amount so the greedy players pick up extra. Modern day football is pathetic. Average players earning more than some of the top chief executives in the country. It's about time us the fans refuse this total piss take
Of course, the real issue at the heart of this is footballers and their agents demanding £7'000 / £8'000+ a week to play second tier football, whilst the rest of us - who would be happy to earn in year what they take out the club in a month - are left to argue with each other over whether an extra £50 a year is fair or not.
Of course, this isn't an issue unique to the Albion, but is the reason why I hardly go to football anymore.
I think that the club need to look at people that cleary don't use the travel ie the buses and trains. Those people are disabled and are already paying £180.00 to park. This isn't a luxury it is a necessity. For example myself and my husband travel to matches with my disabled Mum. From next season we are getting a senior ticket for my Dad so that means there will now be 4 people in the car. Now between the 4 of us we will be paying £45.00 each for the season to use the car park. The club with the increase to the travel has now decided that we will also be paying £100.00 per season for something that we can't and will never be able to use. We don't choose to bring the car it is a must a my Mum wouldn't be able to get to games without us and the car. I just feel that the club are asking us to pay for travel twice which is very unfair. They wouldn't expect someone to pay for 2 pints and and only get 1 so why should we?
What about the drivers, walkers, cyclists, short-distance travellers ? Subsidy for them
I think Mr. Barber covers that in this quote:
I am well aware that some fans do not believe they should have to pay the travel subsidy, because they do not use the train or bus services to the stadium on matchdays but the travel subsidy is not just about trains and buses.
Our travel commitment included building new road junctions, developing and hiring car parks, providing cycle routes and cycle parking and improving footpaths. The travel plan also provides for club stewarding for many of these different modes of transport.
Wont those people who use the car parks be paying for them anyway?
For the car park, it should be free for 4 people + in a car, a fiver for 3, tenner for 2 and £15 if you drive on your tod.