Search results

That cant be right - because his stats are good

They seemed to have missed out: 'gave the ball away in really important areas' 3 'just ambles about after losing the ball then wave hands in the air' 2 'aimless passes' 5 'get in own teams way' 2

Seriously? Or windup?

I don’t think anyone beats Liverpool without a bit of luck

Weiffer just has to go down as an expensive mistake.

I thought Lampty did ok. There are limits to your defensive prowess if you’re 3 feet tall

Yes it was a kind of joke

Its strangely polarising this goalkeeper choice. Personally I think Verbruggen is just about better overall, but only just ahead of Steele who has better distribution.

1-3 Weiffer hattrick :)

it’s not just today though. He’s directly cost us 3 goals so far this season with misdirected simple passes. Positionally, he doesn’t seem to have a clue - seems to always keep an opposition player between him and the player in possession. When defending, he seems to just get in the way of the...

Is it though? He needs to show something - anything that gives a hint that there might be a player there. There just isnt.

You're right of course.

Most importantly, Weiffer cost me my place on the score prediction table. 3-1 all day.

Fair play to Wolves they kept at it. Poor subs (notably one) cost us.

Well there is - hes been consistently poor every time he's played. So dont pick him anymore.

Hes had enough chances now and is just nowhere near the level. Managed to pick out the one defender....

200 a month is crazy money. So 4,800 quid for 2 years o_O

Will it though? I thought most of the crap that went into the mass-produced stuff was to make it last a bit longer.

Personally speaking, the reason is that I don't have the self control not eat the whole damn loaf as soon as its ready.

I'm pretty sure wherever you live has a once in a hundred year chance of some freak event or other happening to it.