No there isn’t, politicians lie all the time.
Is there going to be an economic cost of Brexit in terms of higher prices, diluted consumer and worker rights, less freedom of movement and weaker security links and protocols?...undoubtedly.
But those issues weren’t important to the Brexit...
Must say I'm inclined to agree with you.
The arguments for remain were economic based.
The arguments for Brexit were sovereignty based.
People had a choice and made it.
1 Is not realistic. Turf Moor as an asset is not worth very much as a standalone, certainly far less than £200m.
2a is unlikely. The loans have come from third parties rather than the owners themselves, so the parties making money from interest charges. Can't see Alan Pace taking money out in...
Agree, at CB he's been okay, has struggled at times in the air at set pieces (not the only one to do that) and was turned inside out by Rashford. He's made some good interceptions and does look confident on the ball. Has brought the ball well out of defence, but so has Webster.
Definitely his...
Surely the GUPPY has to be in one of the rounds? Small, but according to himself, very, very hard. Only let down by being incredibly racist.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
I know a lot of people on NSC think that Graham Potter tinkers with the side too much. These figures show the time the most played XI have spent on the pitch as a proportion of total minutes.
Pensioners who have refused the Pfizer vaccine because it’s foreign and want the Oxford one instead have seen their Pfizer jabs go to NHS staff instead of seeing them wasted.
I’ve had a load of stick from Burnley fans (and Alan Pace) today so was trying to be nice as didn’t want to fall out with you too.
The interest rates quoted would seem to be about right as MSD Holdings borrowed at 9% themselves last year so will want to make a profit.
Sent from my iPad...
It’s a bit like buying a house for £200k including its contents. One of the contents is a safe which contains £40k.
You take the money from the safe and use that as part payment to the previous house owner.
The £350m has always looked high but based on Burnley maintaining their footballing success on existing cost base. That’s a challenge but SD has managed it to date. If a club’s valuation looks intuitively high (which Burnley’s does) then indicates the club has been punching above its weight, how...
If ALK don’t make payments on time then shares go back to former owner.
Borrowing at somewhere between 9.5-12% on the £80m loan according to Bloomberg/Athletic and other sources I can’t reveal.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk