The point is that you're not making a profit if it will cost you much more than your original purchase price to replace the item, and as this is a personal item rather than a tv insurers tend not to turn up with a replacement ring but let the insured replace it themselves.
Is the gem card...
It is indemnification to put you back into the same financial position but in the case of contents it is often replacement value that will be used otherwise you won't be in the same position. That said I don't imagine too many insurers would pay £1000 over the top of purchase value, especially...
Congratulations. Possibly the most retarded thing ever written on here. And that's saying something given the level of fuckwittery around on a daily basis.
No, it's a bollocks argument. Of course ANY game including a WC final is not going to stir you unless it's your team playing. A WC final involving England and his argument falls to pieces.
The thing is a lot of people on here hear things all the time, some of them from more reliable sources than others. I knew the main friendly would be spurs weeks before it was announced as I'd heard from someone who would definitely know. Others on here can attest to this. I didn't stick it...
Eh?
I'm not sure a timber merchant would be directly authorised by the FSA! I can imagine the looks on their faces if you started banging on about TCF in there.
Don't you think it's more likely that a few people do know things but simply choose not to betray any source by outright naming players we are in for on here when that could drop them in it?