Search results

Well I’ve searched http://www.thefa.com/football-rules-governance/lawsandrules/laws/futsal/law-12---fouls-and-misconduct and I’m struggling to see where an accidental standing on a players ankle is a foul. Can you highlight the bit you are referring to please.

Which Law in football defines accidentally standing on an opposition players foot as being a penalty and therefore the correct call? Not arguing but am interested in being educated on this.

To be fair midnight_rendezvous made this point strongly on another thread.

‘Mostly clean’ doesn’t equate to being a ‘picture of health’, but I’m sure you know that.

I’m intrigued, where do you live?

So despite it being pointed out that he’s been mostly clean for about 18 months you are happy to publicly state “he’s ****ed”. Based on what exactly?

He was doing really well in the 12-18 months before he moved up to Leicester, generally sober and believe it or not a pleasure to chat to even if his language was generally appalling. He is also too generous for his own good, especially as he obviously doesn’t earn a fraction of what he used to...

I give you. :D :D

Mine, usually. :D

They look a bit too young to hold down jobs.

We should obviously eat less meat, that’s a given. It does piss me off when people use this fact to drive a different agenda. People like you, I guess. :)

Some knob occasionally brings his bloody cat to my local at weekends.

Firstly I actually found some of those papers you kindly provided links to actually informative and interesting and have been working my way through them. I’m not obsessed regarding rice production, whereas you do seem obsessed with animal agriculture. Personally I’d be happier if people took a...

I’m pretty sure you got your data from the vegan campaign website www.cowspiracy.com. No wonder it didn’t mention the methane emissions from rice growing in any of the articles you listed. ???

I was referring to the plethora of links you provided earlier, none of which appeared to refer to the impact of rice production. I’m not sure why you quoted this article, specifically did you read in the methodology where it states “We limited analyses to non-rice cereal crops”?

If, on top of greenhouse gas emissions, you take into account water consumption, occupied land mass, water pollution, waste, deforestation and dead zones, then why isn’t rice production getting a similar bad press?

Not true for Europe Nor the USA

Most my friends think the same way.

Why all the fluff about working hard and saving all ŷear for a holiday? None of that reduces the environmental impact of making that flight, does it. And I used the term ****, not c*nt.