But he is a known antagonist. Far from me to defend the Met, but this copper is doing his best against an antagonist, not a man crossing the road as the BBC and Sunak would like us to think
Thank you, the only point I'm making here is that this is not a jewish man walking cross the street. It took my 15year old to google this early Sunday on the way to football. Maybe a better headline would be "Jewish activist confronts march and unfortunate copper gets tongue-tied"
He's not "having a walk" he's an antagonist.
See Sky https://news.sky.com/story/sky-news-footage-reveals-new-details-of-exchange-between-police-and-antisemitism-campaigner-called-openly-jewish-13120104
Whether that's right or wrong I have no idea, but he isn't out "for a little walk after...
This is my view too. He knew exactly what he was doing. On Radio 4 early this morning he claimed he was just "out for a walk". I have no dog in this fight but it's a horrible mess. In this case, and I really wasn't after a binfest, I think the officer acted fairly sensibly, maybe he didn't....
They know he was (google him). Now my question is still there, mob baiting maybe, but he should still be allowed to have free passage. I'm no fan of the Met but that officer took it on the chin
Purely for discussion, I really don't know the rights and wrongs of this, but it does seem that his "finished synagogue and went for a little walk" is not quite the whole story. Did the policeman do anything particularly wrong? I honestly don't know
This is very disturbing for a pre-arranged visit. Clearly (it seems) this man was a BG employee/sub but his actions are very suspicious, it must be reported to stop him trying this on again
Southgate must be the least inspiring manager in world football. He has a pool of world-beating talent and plays maguire, an accident waiting to happen, chilwell, awful, gallagher, awful. This is painful to watch