Search results

The opinions they're sharing are an embarrassment. Also, how are you measuring Tucker's intelligence? I'm not convinced he's more intelligent than me, so why would that make me embarrassed?

Tucker Carlson and Elon Musk. What an embarrassment :facepalm:

If I hear a nice engine note from a nice car owned by someone considerably richer than me, my time is usually enhanced rather than ruined.

Sorry, what does that say exactly?

We don't have one when defending a corner, we don't have one when playing out from the back and losing the ball, or when we've managed to get everyone back behind the ball and in position. But for Spurs' second goal they cut us wide open because of our high line. They only had one touch in our...

You're misunderstanding xg. It was 0.07 after the shit ball. If the cross was average (instead of shit), the xg for that would be high.

But Fab doesn't seem to think so, based on him saying he'd rather win 1-0 than 5-2.

I don't know what brash means, but this is a war between Russia and Ukraine, not ww3

Why all the empty seats?

Eesh. So after we've played 10, we'll have played all the big teams except Villa.

We're talking about the second goal so why have you added the first goal? The ball went through our high back line, rather than over it. Since when did it need to go over us for the high line to be the issue? Spurs played two passes and attacked with pace and we were in immediate trouble. It...

Yeah, but after the game it's really embarrassing asking people what happened.

Vicente

No we didn't. Re-watch the goal. We couldn't give it away in our half, we didn't have anyone in our half. Spurs played it out from their keeper, we defended on the halfway line and we didn't get a touch until it was on the way into our net. Solanke only had one touch in our half. Spurs' second...

I'm just going to add that the second goal we conceded against Spurs was because of our high line. We were on the half way line, Solanke got the ball, passed it through our centre backs, Werner ran into the area with it (while our defenders were all running towards our own goal), and laid it off...

Not really, Tony would just convert the loan to equity.

That's how Man City want to spin it, but the PL are also claiming the win, saying there are a couple of technicalities the need to tie up in the wording of the rules.

I'm happy if we can get it working, but I don't think we can use a game where we shipped 4 goals in the first half as evidence that it's working. Chelsea didn't need to score any more goals and were happy to stop us scoring, so they didn't need to beat our offside trap. We've let in more goals...

In which case I hope Tony sues them for libel. Again.

I imagine they're just behaving like toddlers for the money. Most reactions are fake. Imagine someone behaving like that in the stands.