Search results

What, even when you're playing teams whose season is already finished? It's also the case when you're playing teams who are in between gruelling Euro matches.

:unsure: :laugh: Well you managed to remember us when we were asset stripped, so I see no reason for us to ever not consider you our rivals. Obviously fans may joke otherwise, but that's to be expected.

Another interesting comment on us: 'They haven't changed at all despite the run of 1 point from 4 games' Excuse me?

Because they're as thick as shit

You got tickets for day 5?

Thanks

How many times has a team opened with 550+ and lost?

Can't be putting catches down if we want to win this

I'd forgotten about the great Hannibal Lector. Trump talks so much crap every time he speaks that I just can't remember it all. Did the apologists on here try and justify his Hannibal comments?

Should I assume this pitch will still be a billiard table on day 5?

Yeah I see what you mean. Obviously if the lino thinks it's offside, they should flag when the ball goes out.

Yes but I think his point was that if the assistant doesn't think it's offside, then it will be a corner - but if the automated system can say it's offside quickly, could that mean the decision is given before the ball goes out for what would be an unfair corner.

Bloody hell that's awful. So sorry for him, family and friends :(

We know we'll not be spending at that level again for a while, I don't think anyone here has suggested otherwise. But if we sell players for big money I wouldn't be surprised if we replace them with what we have, and buy new prospects to replace those promoted.

No I'm not saying that the players we've bought won't be promoted, but when they are promoted I'd expect us to replace them (if we've sold some star players). And if we did exceed expectations and qualify for Europe I don't think Bloom would want to sell our best players. That's not to say we...

Oh ok, fair enough if that's what he said. But... I think we were told there were a couple of other players that we were also looking at, that didn't happen?

Surely if he was a first choice player, we'd have demanded more for him?

That's what I said - he wasn't a first choice player.

We wanted Gross to stay, but he's been so good for us for so many years it wouldn't have been right. Gilmour went because we didn't think he was good enough. Yes we'd have liked to keep as backup, particularly with Matt's injury, but he was not a first choice player, hence the sale.