Search results

There is no 20% offer

Probably Scott Mills

It's WW3 I tell you!

Yes, but it doesn't matter as long as Ukraine refuse. No one (Trump can try) can legitimately argue to Ukraine that it's right they give up some of it. You don't invade a country, fail, and then get to keep some of it.

Sorry if I'm being dumb here - which Russians in Brazil?

No dickhead policy

No, Russia are losing 1,000 a day at the moment, but they weren't at the start of the war.

What could possibly go wrong. We must support Ukraine for long enough for the Russian economy to go completely tits up. There's a lot of complaint that we haven't done enough to support Ukraine, and I've felt the same. But how long can Russia sustain this war? Have experts quietly allowed the...

Nice. I saw the ingredients (didn't read the manual) and guessed at more calories than that, but 416 isn't bad is it.

The bookie? You overestimate my powers.

I don't like seeing a fellow Albion fan being robbed of £4 a week, but you're right, I don't want you missing out on £15m. It's quite a conundrum.

So you're doing the same thing every week, and failing every week. Something something definition of madness.

No, you're accidentally falling into Putin's narrative. The UK will stick with international law, and allowing Ukraine to defend itself with these weapons is within that law. It is Russia who break international law every single day, not Ukraine or its allies.

Yeah, but City didn't have 20 players on the pitch

Adingra is a good player. I'll trust the manager to make the right call.

It's just liquid. As long as you stick to the plan, the weight will come off.

I think we're going to win.

He's good, but someone has to be dropped as it's difficult to play both him and Rutter

I think changes were made (crimes added, definitions changed) but Nazis from ww2 were prosecuted for war crimes. Difficult to do that if they weren't crimes during the war, but I don't know.

No, there were rules of engagement before the first World War.