Search results

I agree. He was injured lots last season as well.. that wasnt because he didnt want to be here. He is a bit crocked but I think he wants to play.. when he took his shirt of after scoring last season he looked pretty happy to be here! I think he still is... maybe not his misses but who knows.

but when they go they go like sh*t off a shovel. He is sucj a joy to watch when he's playing.. total class. I think Gus is playing this right. You cant put him out with the reserves on a cold wet monday night. I'm sure Gus is treating him differently and he probably should.. He could make all...

BBC Sport - Price of football in numbers We got the most expensive pies in the top 4 leagues.. drawing with Fulham. So pleased we are top of something.

thanks Mr Straw :-)

Any chance we can get people to vote for Gary Johnson, local Brighton lad in the running for this 'local food growers' award. He's up for the South East.. and needs soem votes.. He runs the showcase allotment garden in Preston Park. http://www.localfoodgrants.org/heroes?cid=46

the fact that it is indeed 'observable' make no difference, in fact that just substantiates my claim. That science has no understanding of what it actually is. Not so easy I'm afraid. Starfish for exapmle have no brain, but they move and hunt and have awareness of their suroundings.. Same goes...

describing how photons behave and making lasers work is not the same as understanding what a photon actually is.

you say "its a quantum of light. science tells us its mass...." Does it ? ??? Is your understanding as deep as you think ? Does a photon have mass ?? What is its mass then ? Please tell me, that should be simple for you to do if science knows. And you are happy to accept that a photon is...

mate how hard is it for you to understand this ? all I can think is that your faith in science has blinded you to logic! I have no belief that Science will bridge all the explanatory gaps I mentioned. I have NO belief... Do you get it. I am looking at the facts as they are NOW. I dont need...

I'm talking about the big questions... The most fundamental questions. Science as you point out describes and understands many many physical and chemical processes and can turn that knowledge to all sorts of magnificent machines. Because it can do this, it unwittingly maybe, presents itself as...

ah but you cant prove a theory to be true. You can only prove it to be false. dont get me wrong.. I believe evolution to be true... just being devils advocate :)

shot.. scored.. it must be Peter Ward !

thats not a very tasteful comment really is it? Banter is fine, but alluding to sexual abuse for no reason is rather sick in my opinion. I would suggest that you are not a 'man of science' as you so pompously state....and youre entirely wrong, I have an A level in Physics and physics is one...

I'm afraid your post is nonsense. Neither me, nor more enlightened Scientists believe that science wont bridge the explanatory gap, we accept it hasnt.. simple. I am not expressing a belief that it wont, I amstating facts. Its amusing that I am being more scientific in my analysis than you, when...

I think Spinoza was considered a pantheist not an atheist. His and Einsteins 'God' was not a personal God, a moral God or any religious God, but nonetheless they both had a concept of 'God' albeit very different to what most people thinkk when you say 'God'

I dont think so... not disengenous anyway.. maybe stretched a little to make the point.. Some followers of Science 'believe' science will answer all these questions. Other more enlightened scientists accept it probably wont. Faith in Science IS comparable to faith in religion.

thats a handy interpretation for you isnt it. and you are ignoring his direct quote about believing in 'Spinoza's God'.. this is the kind of behaviour that I see those who believe in 'science' use against 'religious' people all the time.. Selective.. only seeing what 'they' want to see.

I am not religious. However I dont think priests claim to be infallible ! Science itself is not 'religious' but the followers of science do seem to exert some religious behaviour. You said this; "It behaves like as wave or a particle depending on how you try to look at it. But as I previously...

Einstein also famously said 'god does not play dice' He certainly didnt believe in a personal God thats true, but he never described himself as an atheist either. From wickipedia; '"I believe in Spinoza's God, who reveals himself in the harmony of all that exists, not in a God who concerns...

WDL 4pts.. If Vicente plays automatic Champions League place.. before November..