Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Football] Palace v Millwall







Hamilton

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 7, 2003
13,288
Brighton
He misjudged the ball from Hughes.
Shouldn't have come for the ball, as he was second favourite, but once he had, he made sure he cleared it.

I really don't think it's as bad a mistake as it's being painted.
The tackle on Mitoma, last season, was far more pre-meditated
Remind me never to play football with you 😂

You’re not a keeper are you?
 




Motogull

Todd Warrior
Sep 16, 2005
10,914
I like Mateta - a big burly 9 who has a good work ethic. Sounds like he'll be fine and that is the main thing.

The 'keeper will learn from it but may find his career path is downward.

What is it about that stadium and high kicks?
 


Springal

Well-known member
Feb 12, 2005
25,244
GOSBTS
he’d probably have got his own player if Mateta hadn’t fouled / pushed the defender
 












Motogull

Todd Warrior
Sep 16, 2005
10,914
Oh, and Beaky. I'm not bothered what he said but you know that when BBC emailed the main men at Palace asking who might available for a HT interview, he replied 'ME' before they got any out of offices.
 


dazzer6666

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Mar 27, 2013
57,204
Burgess Hill
Usual hyperbole and exaggeration from many quarters I guess.....it was a stonewall red and Oliver should have realised immediately but worst ever ??? It would at least need to be 100% premeditated for that (Keane on Haaland for example) and I don't think he was intending to injure Mateta. Ill-judged and executed, and dangerous for sure but not the worst ever. Beaky was caught in the raw emotion of the immediate aftermath.
 


Not Andy Naylor

Well-known member
Dec 12, 2007
9,109
Seven Dials
People have shown the still picture of the challenge and, looking at that, it's incontestably a straight red, and how the ref didn't give it immediately is hard to say.

BUT look at the live footage and see where the shadow of the stand is.

On a very sunny day, the keeper (wearing dark it) is running from the shade into bright sunlight, and the sun is in the ref's eyes. Perhaps not quite so straightforward a decision then, possibly?
 




trueblue

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
11,198
Hove
Agree, eyes were on the ball and that was his sole focus (excuse the pun)
No malice in it at all.

Unfortunate injury, it’s a contact sport and things happen in a split second but he had every right to go for the ball which he won.

Had he seen Mateta I wonder if he’d have gone with his foot.

The outcome deserved a red but it should just be that, a standard red card and no additional sanctions
My split-second thought about the keeper as the ball dropped over the top was 'what's he doing out there?'. Once he was committed outside the box, he had little choice but to go for it and didn't fancy sticking his head in. So he went with a very high foot, which was a bad decision - but one taken in a fraction of a second, pumped up by the atmosphere very early in a game that was always going to be feisty.

No malice but fully justified red card, obviously.
 


Durlston

"You plonker, Rodney!"
Jul 15, 2009
10,196
Haywards Heath
There were plenty of audible chants from the Holmesdale end of "where's your goalie gone?" to the Millwall fans yesterday. Whether this was a direct aim at the tragedy of Matija Sarkic in the summer or the nutcase sending off is still unclear. But hey, let's give the Premier League club the benefit of the doubt and accuse Millwall fans of being scum for singing one of the oldest chants in the game when they didn't know the seriousness of the situation.

All the reporters can f**k right off with dragging Millwall's name through the mud again.
 


Thunder Bolt

Silly old bat
Update from a Palace friend, Mateta’s ear was nearly sliced in half. He received 28 stitches. When he left Selhurst Park he was covered in blood, and in a neck brace.
 




darkwolf666

Well-known member
Nov 8, 2015
7,968
Sittingbourne, Kent
People have shown the still picture of the challenge and, looking at that, it's incontestably a straight red, and how the ref didn't give it immediately is hard to say.

BUT look at the live footage and see where the shadow of the stand is.

On a very sunny day, the keeper (wearing dark it) is running from the shade into bright sunlight, and the sun is in the ref's eyes. Perhaps not quite so straightforward a decision then, possibly?
Won't have a problem with shadows, with Palace's new invisible stand!
 


rippleman

Well-known member
Oct 18, 2011
5,132
Totally agree but under the current rules for subjective decisions such as handballs or fouls the ref has to be sent to the screen and shown the evidence themselves as the final decision always lays with the on field ref.

For factual errors, like ball out of play or offside VAR can make the decision themselves without the need for the ref to go to the screen.
Unfortunately this is true. It needs changing as dazzer suggests. "You f***ed up, change your decision to red card".

But how Oliver "missed" the challenge is of greater concern. It was so clear, so obvious and so dangerous, it was "neglect of duty" on Oliver's part. You would like to think he would be doing a month or two in L2 to "re-train" - but we know he won't get sanctioned for his incompetence.

I hate Palace and I'm no fan of Mateta but that is one of the very worst challenges I have seen at any level of football. I wish Mateta well and hope that Millwall keeper gets a record ban for his assault.
 


Durlston

"You plonker, Rodney!"
Jul 15, 2009
10,196
Haywards Heath
Is this still the lead story in football?

Christ, I'd take 25 stitches to get £100,000 a week and the very best treatment and care to recovery.

Stop being such pùssies, Palace, and move on.
 


hans kraay fan club

The voice of reason.
Helpful Moderator
Mar 16, 2005
63,036
Chandlers Ford
Is this still the lead story in football?

Christ, I'd take 25 stitches to get £100,000 a week and the very best treatment and care to recovery.

Stop being such pùssies, Palace, and move on.
It isn't really anything to do with Palace at this point, is it? It is the FA who are pushing for a longer than standard ban for the Millwall keeper - not Mateta or his club :shrug:
 




schmunk

Well-used member
Jan 19, 2018
10,782
Mid mid mid Sussex
But how Oliver "missed" the challenge is of greater concern. It was so clear, so obvious and so dangerous, it was "neglect of duty" on Oliver's part. You would like to think he would be doing a month or two in L2 to "re-train" - but we know he won't get sanctioned for his incompetence.
In his defence, he was completely unsighted by Mateta, and the ball pinged away exactly in the way he would expect if the Millwall goalie got to it first (as he did).

Mateta going down holding his bleeding head might have been a BIT of a clue, though...

Screenshot 2025-03-05 162311.png
 


jackanada

Well-known member
Jul 19, 2011
3,611
Brighton
My split-second thought about the keeper as the ball dropped over the top was 'what's he doing out there?'. Once he was committed outside the box, he had little choice but to go for it and didn't fancy sticking his head in. So he went with a very high foot, which was a bad decision - but one taken in a fraction of a second, pumped up by the atmosphere very early in a game that was always going to be feisty.

No malice but fully justified red card, obviously.
If he had gone with his head then we'd quite likely be looking at a head to head or head to shoulder collision. Possibly not a red card then but a far worse outcome for one or both players and match abandoned. So going with the feet not the most irresponsible thing he could have done.
Also can people calm down about the number of stitches. 28 stitches in A&E on a Friday night would be a big old gash and a nasty scar. 28 teensy weensy stitches from a plastic surgeon is a different matter.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here