- Nov 11, 2009
- 12,524
Total fascist c***The man is excrement.
I despise him.almost as much as I hate Trump
Total fascist c***The man is excrement.
If this country is to rearm itself in any meaningful way it will need to reverse this country’s current trajectory of de-industrialisation. That will mean the need for cheap energy and lots of it. That means oil and gas from the North Sea maybe even bringing fracking back, or coal. Personally I think it’s too late we are no longer a major steel maker, but you can’t expect to significantly increase industrial output and move to renewables. Fantasy.You seem to see everything in black and white, but the reality is you can pursue your green agenda whilst upping defence spending, and you can request a Customs Union without full EU membership.
All the while the UK remains a nuclear power then your option a) is off the table, and clearly with Trump in charge option c) is also off the table. So, yes, the European option is more attractive but obviously regaining full membership is not the pressing requirement now.
If we propose a Customs Union with the EU, they agree and make a counter-offer about full membership then that can be put to the British people.
Brexit happened because people were worried about immigration, they believed they were helping the NHS, they believed the lies our media had drip-fed then about the EU for 4 decades, and because they were sick of Cameron and his austerity.
The UK population - when asked the question - "In hindsight, do you think Britain was right or wrong to leave the European Union?" has been solidly c. 55% wrong, 33% right, 12% don't know since November 2022, so for 27 months the polls have produced the same answer. And a Customs Union is not even rejoining, so even some of the remaining 45% will be OK with that.
The international, populist lurch to the right has been fuelled by two main factors: inward migration and social media disinformation and 'fake news'. The right - and the rich - have become very adept at manipulation, and now we see blatant meddling in the elections of other countries, of cross-pollenation of extremism.
I think the UK and EU states will happily foot the bill for a peacekeeping force in a demilitarised zone within Ukraine, but Russia have said they don't want that. Starmer is right that the US have to be the security backstop, it's just not in America's interests to walk away from this conflict without giving that because any future Trump / American guarantee on anything will be viewed as worthless.
He wouldn't even have to provide soldiers, just ammo, tech, hardware and surveillance, and even that could be financed by a deal involving minerals. His domestic armaments manufacturers and construction companies will not be happy to see the contracts and the minerals go elsewhere.
Would you feel your kids are safe in dance classes and concerts under Trump's America then? Are you seriously suggesting young kids are safer in America than the UK, or that what happened in Southport is anything to do with Keir Starmer?If this country is to rearm itself in any meaningful way it will need to reverse this country’s current trajectory of de-industrialisation. That will mean the need for cheap energy and lots of it. That means oil and gas from the North Sea maybe even bringing fracking back, or coal. Personally I think it’s too late we are no longer a major steel maker, but you can’t expect to significantly increase industrial output and move to renewables. Fantasy.
The British people want responsible British leaders that take British national interest seriously and put British people first. Labour and Starmer (like the Tories before) are a party that acts in the very opposite of that position and have done for years. This episode is only proving that, most people want their kids to be safe in dance classes and at concerts, he isn't solving that.
I don’t think you are grasping the reality of what Trump has done, he has not just exposed the stupidity of the European political elite for neglecting their defence over recent years, he has demonstrated the EU is a paper tiger, itself simply an organ of self aggrandisement by European political pygmies to feather their political nests by impoverishing the peoples in European countries they govern.
As ever it is only NATO that would defend Europe. The US is NATO and the EU is an irrelevance that will need to change or die.
To quote Bismarck, you don’t stop an army on the border with eloquence. You need an army and that army needs to possess the will to fight. This is by its leaders, it’s constituents and it’s underlying population.The Russian population is 144million, whereas the combined population of the EU, UK and NATO members Canada and Turkey is c 640 million.
In 2023 Russia's GDP was 2.02 trillion, Canada's alone is 2.14 trillion, the UK's is 3.4 trillion, Turkey 1.12 trillion and the EU is c. 12 trillion.
Therefore, in terms of manpower and money then what is left of NATO still dwarves Russia. Their economy is weak and their ruler is old, and when peace comes they will find they have less friends than before the war. This is not the Soviet Union of old.
Granted, the immediate threat is sizeable but in numerical terms the Russian threat should be able to be managed, with or without the USA.
Labour and Starmer are baked into a political establishment, (here and in the EU) that has in recent years facilitated the importation of people into this country that we know f*ck all about.Would you feel your kids are safe in dance classes and concerts under Trump's America then? Are you seriously suggesting young kids are safer in America than the UK, or that what happened in Southport is anything to do with Keir Starmer?
You are conflating two things. Ability to fight and diversity.To quote Bismarck, you don’t stop an army on the border with eloquence. You need an army and that army needs to possess the will to fight. This is by its leaders, it’s constituents and it’s underlying population.
Russia has demonstrated throughout the last 3 years that it is a functioning army, can absorb casualties and loss of material whilst maintaining a will to fight. Sure it may not be as technically advanced as aspects of western forces but it is an experienced army tested by 3 years of war.
A NATO without the US is essentially us, the French and Germany, and the Germans won’t fight Russia because it is politically unpopular and their prosperity is dependent on cheap Russian energy. Everyone knows this, it’s because of Germany Ukraine wasn’t allowed to join NATO, to quote Zelenskyy.
France spends less than us on defence, and we possess less than 20000 front line troops.
Eastern European countries are not fighting either, for same reasons as Germany.
As previously referenced, polling indicates only 11% of 18-27 year olds would fight for the U.K. and I suspect that means even less for Ukraine. This country has no will to fight, and people, especially on this board are deluded if they think we can put a BEF into Ukraine.
Diversity is strength except when what
Give it a rest.Labour and Starmer are baked into a political establishment, (here and in the EU) that has in recent years facilitated the importation of people into this country that we know f*ck all about.
If we aren’t even willing to secure our own borders from foreigners that wish us harm, then it’s fair to say Starmer’s routine on Ukraine isn’t going to get the political cut through in the wider population many on here think.
JD Vance’s speech in Munich spelt out last week how the US Govt sees the problem with keeping Europe safe. Sometimes the truth hurts.
That’s all very well, but are you going to answer my question?Labour and Starmer are baked into a political establishment, (here and in the EU) that has in recent years facilitated the importation of people into this country that we know f*ck all about.
If we aren’t even willing to secure our own borders from foreigners that wish us harm, then it’s fair to say Starmer’s routine on Ukraine isn’t going to get the political cut through in the wider population many on here think.
JD Vance’s speech in Munich spelt out last week how the US Govt sees the problem with keeping Europe safe. Sometimes the truth hurts.
I’ve seen you make this statement several times. It’s nonsense. This article is 2 years old. Are you saying it was wrong then or that they have gone back to getting their oil and gas from Russia?the Germans won’t fight Russia because it is politically unpopular and their prosperity is dependent on cheap Russian energy.
Your first two paragraphs are almost word for word what I said to my wife recently. Unbelievable we've let it come to this!
Much as it would be cathartic and play well at home, it’s the last thing he should do.
Look at the reaction to Zelenskyy’s disinformation comment and how Trump escalated.
The man has a personality disorder, directly challenging him leads to tantrums and escalation and you can be damn sure he’s willing to escalate more than anyone else.
Starmer needs to play this very carefully.
To be fair it is a thread about a war, that is potentially going to suck this country in. I don't see why controlling our borders is either irrelevant or controversial in the discussion. Does anybody genuinely think that the UK shouldn't control its borders?You are conflating two things. Ability to fight and diversity.
You often write a load of stuff, and then introduce diversity,
Give it a rest.
Dance classes, diversity and controlling our borders have f all to do with this forum.
Peddle your poison elsewhere.
I don't want to enter a discussion about borders. That would give Cunning Fergus exactly what he wants.To be fair it is a thread about a war, that is potentially going to suck this country in. I don't see why controlling our borders is either irrelevant or controversial in the discussion. Does anybody genuinely think that the UK shouldn't control its borders?
Like you Vance couldn't find his arse without a map.Labour and Starmer are baked into a political establishment, (here and in the EU) that has in recent years facilitated the importation of people into this country that we know f*ck all about.
If we aren’t even willing to secure our own borders from foreigners that wish us harm, then it’s fair to say Starmer’s routine on Ukraine isn’t going to get the political cut through in the wider population many on here think.
JD Vance’s speech in Munich spelt out last week how the US Govt sees the problem with keeping Europe safe. Sometimes the truth hurts.
But wait. What's this?
(Zelensky looks forlorn, resigned).
Cf seems to continually conflate opinion with fact, a noticeable tactic of the likes of Trump and his acolytes. JD Vance and truth in the same sentence being a prime example.Like you Vance could it find jos arse without a map.
He like Trump and Farage are just Russian stooges which by default make you one.Putin is on his arse, he can’t take Ukraine so please explain how he can ‘do’ the rest of Europe?
In my lifetime the big fear in America was the ‘commies’ reds under the beds etc etc always being pushed by those in power there to justify their foreign policies. So quite how so many people can (knowingly?) vote in a genuine Russian proxy is quite the about turn..surely some are starting to see the light now?I watched some CNN today to see what the view from the US was. To a man (and woman) all of the news reporters and everyone they interviewed more or less said that Trump was batshit crazy. Maybe there is still hope.